Forum Discussion
Which objects will Sync-Only device groups actually sync?
I'm looking for a mechanism to synchronize the configuration between four load balancers: a production pair of load balancers (in a Sync-Failover cluster) and a DR pair of load balancers (also in a Sync-Failover cluster).
I'd like to use a Sync-Only device group to sync configs between the four LTMs, but the documentation vaguely implies that certain objects are not synced in a Sync-Only device group. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a good list of which object types are or are not synced in a Sync-Only group. Will a Sync-Only group sync profiles, monitors, irules, pools, and vips?
Also, I see in the docs that the Sync-Only device groups functions as an override of the Sync-Failover device group. Will putting these objects (pools, vips, etc) in a folder synced via the Sync-Only device group interfere with failover?
Thanks,
Mark
4 Replies
- Georgi__Joe__St
Altostratus
Hi Mark, Do you have any success with this? I am trying to implement same in our organization... without success for the moment
- Randy_Hall
Nimbostratus
I too am in the same boat. I have a case open with F5 support to help me get to this same state. If I get any traction and get it to work, I will come back and post the setup.
- Chris_Grant
Employee
So this is really not as complex as it sounds, but it's also not well documented. A Sync only device group only syncs non traffic objects. It won't sync Virtual Servers, Pools, Floating IPs, etc, but it will sync your APM objects and your ASM policies.
To illustrate how this can be helpful, consider a situation where you have a data center in Denver, and one in Fort Lauderdale. Same configuration, same servers, different IP addressing.
Sync Only allows your ASMs to be centrally managed while automatically protecting both data centers.
Sync-Failover allows for on site redundancy.
- Chris_Grant
Employee
So according to Dev, this is intended. As the virtual server in the partition is in traffic group none, it's not technically a failover object, so it gets synced. The solution is to put the virtual server in common and associate it with a traffic group. Not particularly intuitive until you look at it that way.
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com