Forum Discussion
Using shared object with BigIP
Hi,
Just a "stupid" question:
Is there a reason NOT to use Shared object address list's with a VS?
In contrast using multiple VS configurations (when only destination address is the difference).
Like to hear you thoughts
Please lookup your /config/bigip_base.conf for the ACL related configuration objects.
The shared objects concept may significantly reduce the number of configuration objects, i.e. mixing IPv4/IPv6 source/destination addresse in lists. Same story for destination ports.
When using shared objects some ACL mechanisms are applied in the background.
In the past I saw some issues there (especially in the context of route domains), which seem to be fixed in the current TMOS v15.1.5.1.
- Ed_MartensCirrus
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for the response. This is the same version we are running at the moment 😉Please lookup your /config/bigip_base.conf for the ACL related configuration objects.
The shared objects concept may significantly reduce the number of configuration objects, i.e. mixing IPv4/IPv6 source/destination addresse in lists. Same story for destination ports.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com