Forum Discussion
Load Balancer Traffic Design without using Self IP
Hi everyone
I would like to know if anyone has used a setup that has one large subnet as an outside Vlan (for service VIP's) and it routes to all the different server vlans. Typically, we setup all the server vlans with Self Ip and Floating IP and then use the automap feature to move the traffic.
In this traditional model, we need to always reserve self IP and float IP in the vlans where the servers are built and to allow firewall rules for these IP and the subsequent "Outside" IP.
Is there a design where we can just have the traffic route to the servers? When I do not have a self IP for the vlan, it seems to just send the traffic via the default route.
Thanks
Chung
I have this type of setup where there is no self-ip on the LTM and it works perfectly fine. Reason - All the IP addresses (VIP, Pool members) are advertised in the same routed protocol. I have not come through any issue with this design. It's configured in one arm mode and also uses snat pool.But on F5, you will have to set a default route for reverse traffic.
- Root44_196087Nimbostratus
I am not sure if it exist but will let the others comment.
- Amresh008Nimbostratus
I have this type of setup where there is no self-ip on the LTM and it works perfectly fine. Reason - All the IP addresses (VIP, Pool members) are advertised in the same routed protocol. I have not come through any issue with this design. It's configured in one arm mode and also uses snat pool.But on F5, you will have to set a default route for reverse traffic.
- chungyu_16122Altostratus
Hi
Thanks for the response, are your servers pointing to the router as the default gateway and when the servers respond, is the traffic returning tot he the snat pool address?
Regards
chung
- Amresh008Nimbostratus
The servers are all part of the L3 vlan and they have the corresponding default gateway. The snat pool comes in picture for the incoming traffic and not the outgoing traffic.
- chungyu_16122Altostratus
Thanks alot, I will give it a try.
Chung
- Amresh008Nimbostratus
I have this type of setup where there is no self-ip on the LTM and it works perfectly fine. Reason - All the IP addresses (VIP, Pool members) are advertised in the same routed protocol. I have not come through any issue with this design. It's configured in one arm mode and also uses snat pool.But on F5, you will have to set a default route for reverse traffic.
- chungyu_16122Altostratus
Hi
Thanks for the response, are your servers pointing to the router as the default gateway and when the servers respond, is the traffic returning tot he the snat pool address?
Regards
chung
- Amresh008Nimbostratus
The servers are all part of the L3 vlan and they have the corresponding default gateway. The snat pool comes in picture for the incoming traffic and not the outgoing traffic.
- chungyu_16122Altostratus
Thanks alot, I will give it a try.
Chung
I have this type of setup where there is no self-ip on the LTM and it works perfectly fine. Reason - All the IP addresses (VIP, Pool members) are advertised in the same routed protocol. I have not come through any issue with this design. It's configured in one arm mode and also uses snat pool.But on F5, you will have to set a default route for reverse traffic.
- chungyu_16122Altostratus
Hi
Thanks for the response, are your servers pointing to the router as the default gateway and when the servers respond, is the traffic returning tot he the snat pool address?
Regards
chung
The servers are all part of the L3 vlan and they have the corresponding default gateway. The snat pool comes in picture for the incoming traffic and not the outgoing traffic.
- chungyu_16122Altostratus
Thanks alot, I will give it a try.
Chung
- ErikNimbostratus
Hi, I have a setup that uses this. Have a front-end VS with a public IP and with selection in iRules it send the traffic to a back-end VS. This back-end-VS is APM enabled and are configured with private IPs that does not have any Self-IPs. The back-end VS then communicate with pools. Works perfectly.
Regards Erik
- SWJOCirrostratus
Hi
The best solution for your question is DSR(direct server return).
exactly L3 N Path Routing.
But there is limit on this topology.
Regards,
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com