Forum Discussion
lostmyspaceship
Nimbostratus
Aug 28, 2013Should a pool member that is "available (user disabled)" keep a pool in "available" state?
Suppose you have a pool with 5 pool members who are down (marked by a monitor), and a sixth pool member that is user disabled, but available. Is it supposed to keep the pool in an available state (an...
nitass
Employee
Aug 28, 2013Is it supposed to keep the pool in an available state (and thus the VS), even if it is user disabled?
i think it is available because existing and new connection with persistence record are still accepted.
sol10516: Overview of BIG-IP pool status
http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/10000/500/sol10516.html
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects