Forum Discussion
lostmyspaceship
Nimbostratus
NimbostratusShould a pool member that is "available (user disabled)" keep a pool in "available" state?
Suppose you have a pool with 5 pool members who are down (marked by a monitor), and a sixth pool member that is user disabled, but available. Is it supposed to keep the pool in an available state (and thus the VS), even if it is user disabled? I can't find this information in the documentation. Status inheritance doesn't seem to mention this case.
2 Replies
- nitass
Employee
Is it supposed to keep the pool in an available state (and thus the VS), even if it is user disabled?
i think it is available because existing and new connection with persistence record are still accepted.
sol10516: Overview of BIG-IP pool status
http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/10000/500/sol10516.html 
lostmyspaceshipThanks! That was what I was looking for, must have missed in the docs.
