Mar 27, 2026 - For details about updated CVE-2025-53521 (BIG-IP APM vulnerability), refer to K000156741.

Forum Discussion

ndubey2's avatar
ndubey2
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Apr 24, 2026

Priority Group Activation is not working

Hi All, I have an LDAP VIP configured with a pool, having two members and applied priority group activation so that all the traffic will go to only one server and if that server is not available then only traffic will go to another servers But it seems traffic in going to both the servers and which is causing the problem. 

When I remove one of the server from poll, everything works fine. 

From application prospective all traffic should go to one server and other servers should work as secondary. 

Am I missing any configuration? Load balancing mechanism is round-robin. 

Thanks,

9 Replies

  • Hello ndubey2​ 

    You should have set Priority Group Activation to Less Than 1

    Put you primary server to Priority Group 10 and secondary to Priority Group 5

    lastly set a valid health monitor

    If you have done all these and still not working, I agree with Daniel_Wolf​, sharing your pool config would help

  • application team sending data to this VIP and when we have only one server as pool member everything works fine and all packets are processed successful, the moment I add the secondary server some of the packets get failed. As per application team it is failing because persistency is breaking. 

    • can you reset statistics in pool and confirm if only one server receives traffic?

      • Daniel_Wolf's avatar
        Daniel_Wolf
        Icon for MVP rankMVP

        or run a tcpdump and see where traffic goes and why things break

  • Thanks Everyone for the response. It working fine now. I had removed entire Pool configurations and reconfigured it and its started working now. I can see traffic is going to only one member only. 

    • sircrocodile's avatar
      sircrocodile
      Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus

      Hi, could you please explain what the issue was? Because from what I can see, your configuration is correct. Is it because you are using persistence on your virtual server?