Forum Discussion
Persistence issue with TCP
- Dec 29, 2017
Ok, I finally fix it ^^
The issue was because I created a pool with 4 members, 2 same IP but different service port, cause we have 2 versions who using different socket
And I have 2 Virtual Services different (based on version) with an iRule different for each in order to select specific node with the target port. The irule was like this :
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED { set xxx_node1 "13.x.x.183" set xxx_node2 "40.x.x.221" set xxx_ppol "pool_vm_xxx_prod" set xxx_port yyyy if { ([LB::status pool $xxx_ppol member $xxx_node1 $xxx_port] eq "up") and ([LB::status pool $xxx_ppol member $xxx_node2 $xxx_port] eq "up") } { node $xxx_node1 $xxx_port node $xxx_node2 $xxx_port } elseif { ([LB::status pool $xxx_ppol member $xxx_node1 $xxx_port] eq "up") and ([LB::status pool $xxx_ppol member $xxx_node2 $xxx_port] eq "down") } { node $xxx_node1 $xxx_port } elseif { ([LB::status pool $xxx_ppol member $xxx_node1 $xxx_port] eq "down") and ([LB::status pool $xxx_ppol member $xxx_node2 $xxx_port] eq "up") } { node $xxx_node2 $xxx_port } else { log "Error : Pool $xxx_ppol is down" }
}
Finally, I just recreate 2 new pool specific to each version and on my 2 VS I associate this new pool based on target version and deleted the associated iRule.
And now, my traffic is correctly load balanced 😉
Thanks to all who help me in this situation
Have a nice day, Regards Alex
i hope your not using any persistence and pool configured with round robin ?
ThxS rini
Hi,
No, I don't use any persistence
But yes, I use Round Robin
Problem is coming from Round Robin ?
Thanks, Alex
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com