Forum Discussion
Keycloak as idp for APM
Dear devcentral,
Has anyone successfully integrated keycloak as an OIDC backend for APM on F5? We are running v13.1 so this version should be able to use this feature, right?
So far I have successfully setup a provider using the autodiscover OpenID URI. Created a client application on the keycloak server with the client_id and secret. Next I'm somewhat confused on how to proceed? From what I read in the docs I need to configure the custom requests for keycloak. Though I can't seem the find these.
Kind regards,
Joren
- avengingNimbostratus
I go a little further on this but not yet working in F5.
For the moment using curl to target keycloak from CLI, I was ablle to have a correct reply from the keycloak for introspec/ user info:
curl --location --request POST 'https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect' \ --header 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \ --header 'Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJ5bzhwdzhZcHJ1UG96QzVuX0cyVHZ' \ --data-urlencode 'client_id=F5-APM-Client' \ --data-urlencode 'client_secret=db51def3-xxxx-xxx-xxx-xxx' \ --data-urlencode 'token_type_hint=access_token' \ --data-urlencode 'token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJ5bzhwdzhZcHJ1UG96QzVuX0cyVHZ'
but When I try to create a custom f5 keycloak scope request, I always have the same issue : error: HTTP error 401, Error: invalid_request: Authentication failed.
So I dont understand why ? i try to made tcpdump to see what exactly F5 send to keycloak but, not helped for the moment.
I see client credentials error in keycloak logs :
But double checked the parameters > same used in curl ...
- JorenCNimbostratus
@sebastien doucet your setup is indeed a bit different then mine but error seems related.
We are using ou F5 APM as a full OIDC client, redirecting the user to IDP logon page, requesting token etc..
Regarding the custom scope validation request, mine is more or less the same. Not so many params though, bare minimum only:
What really helped me is to place an iRule between the F5 and keycloak to capture the SSL keys so you can decode the HTTPS traffic in the TCP dump. From there you can decode the tokens etc using jwt.io and validate whats is in there.
#START when CLIENTSSL_HANDSHAKE { log local0. "TCP source port client_side: [TCP::remote_port]" log local0. "RSA Session-ID:[SSL::sessionid] Master-Key:[SSL::sessionsecret]" log local0. "CLIENT_RANDOM [SSL::clientrandom] [SSL::sessionsecret]" } when SERVERSSL_HANDSHAKE { log local0. "TCP source port serv_side: [TCP::local_port]" log local0. "RSA Session-ID:[SSL::sessionid] Master-Key:[SSL::sessionsecret]" log local0. "CLIENT_RANDOM [SSL::clientrandom] [SSL::sessionsecret]" } #END
reference: https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K16700
Also: Is your keycloak server behind an F5 virtual server? If so, make sure you did config keycloak to understand it is running behind a loadbalancer. cfr: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_installation/index.html#_setting-up-a-load-balancer-or-proxy
- avengingNimbostratus
Thanks JorenC. I was finally able to made this working.
Capturing the RSA was not working due to RSA-DHE but I find another way using request logger in keycloak server : https://mirocupak.com/logging-requests-with-undertow/
And it seems that the f5 introspect request is not working as excepted in v15.1 because using the Keycloak scope request posted above the result was :
2020-03-09 13:06:30,504 INFO [io.undertow.request.dump] (default task-15) ----------------------------REQUEST--------------------------- URI=/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect characterEncoding=null contentLength=1666 contentType=[application/x-www-form-urlencoded] header=Proxy-Connection=Keep-Alive header=Accept=*/* header=User-Agent=F5 OAuth Client header=Authorization=Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJ5bzhwdzhZcHJ1UG96QzVuX0cyVHZVSVbOzSDkNlPyDi5A header=oauth_dns_resolver_name=/Common/172.xx.xx.xx header=oauth_serverssl_name=/Common/keycloak-publicssl header=Expect=100-continue header=Content-Type=application/x-www-form-urlencoded header=Content-Length=1666 header=Host=keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443 locale=[] method=POST protocol=HTTP/1.1 queryString= remoteAddr=/172.xx.xx.xx:17741 remoteHost=172.xx.xx.xx scheme=https host=keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443 serverPort=8443 isSecure=true body= %{session.oauth.client.last.access_token}=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJ5bzhwdzhZcHJ1UG96QzVuX0cyVHZVSVbOzSDkNlPyDi5A token_type_hint=access_token --------------------------RESPONSE-------------------------- contentLength=72 contentType=application/json header=Connection=keep-alive header=Content-Type=application/json header=Content-Length=72 header=Date=Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:06:30 GMT status=401
And we see now that the F5 :
- send %{session.oauth.client.last.access_token} in place of token
- miss to send the client-id and client-secret parameters in the body
- send to much useless info to the keycloak like dns resolvers IP, backend server IP, ssl profile....
So I rebuild the request using only custom fields even for those by default like token, client-id...:
and then now it works ! 🙂
I do the same for userinfo request also.
----------------------------REQUEST--------------------------- URI=/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect characterEncoding=null contentLength=1699 contentType=[application/x-www-form-urlencoded] header=Proxy-Connection=Keep-Alive header=Accept=*/* header=User-Agent=F5 OAuth Client header=Authorization=Bearer hVhS2-trG8FsmeRyThTJ7zMGspLxZFGxV9kYjo header=oauth_dns_resolver_name=/Common/172.xxx.xx.xx header=oauth_serverssl_name=/Common/keycloak-publicssl header=Expect=100-continue header=Content-Length=1699 header=Content-Type=application/x-www-form-urlencoded header=Host=keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443 locale=[] method=POST protocol=HTTP/1.1 queryString= remoteAddr=/172.xx.xx.xx:47015 remoteHost=172.xx.xx.xx scheme=https host=keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443 serverPort=8443 isSecure=true body= client_id=F5-APM-Client client_secret=db51def3-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxx token=hVhS2-trG8FsmeRyThTJ7zMGspLxZFGxV9kYjo token_type_hint=access_token --------------------------RESPONSE-------------------------- contentLength=913 contentType=application/json header=Connection=keep-alive header=Content-Type=application/json header=Content-Length=913 header=Date=Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:33:59 GMT status=200 ==============================================================
Using the F5 as a Client and Ressource server for keycloak IDP is also working using f5 request without modification:
So I can confirm that another workaround for the issuer port problem you encounter is to publish your keycloak to a non standard port.
Thanks for your help, I will do a complete configuration guide when I have time available.
- avengingNimbostratus
Hello, just wanted to know if someone finally manage to make this work with F5 APM and keycloak openid (or any custom on premise oAuth2 or openid provider) and authorisation code flow, custom request requests...
I try to do the same for OpenID auth behind an API with v15.1 and AWAF but without success...
- JorenCNimbostratus
We do have it running here. But haven't found the time to do full a write-up on the basic setup via APM.. :(
Any specific questions you have regarding the APM integration?
- avengingNimbostratus
OK, may be I will not have the issue about the port for introspect / userinfo because the token issuer already include the port number as my keycloak is published under port 8443.
I fixed some mistake about the JWKS and now it seems that token is well validated at OAuth Scope(Internal) step but failed at OAuth Scope(External) step:
Mar 3 15:20:48 f5poc notice apmd[12760]: 01490291:5: /Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthResourceServer:Common:dcd521ef:/Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthResourceServer_act_oauth_scope_0_ag: OAuth Scope: succeeded for jwt-provider-list '/Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_providerList_keycloak-provider' Mar 3 15:20:48 f5poc notice apmd[12760]: 014902ae:5: /Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthResourceServer:Common:dcd521ef:/Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthResourceServer_act_oauth_scope_0_1_ag: OAuth Scope: getting list of scopes, associated with access_token, from server '/Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthServer_keycloak-provider' (resource_server_id=F5-APM-Client) Mar 3 15:20:48 f5poc err apmd[12760]: 01490290:3: /Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthResourceServer:Common:dcd521ef:/Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthResourceServer_act_oauth_scope_0_1_ag: OAuth Scope: failed for server '/Common/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth.app/API-Authori-F5ResourceOAuth_oauthServer_keycloak-provider' (resource_server_id=F5-APM-Client), error: HTTP error 401, Error: invalid_request: Authentication failed.
It seems that using the f5 request type is not working but I dont understand how to made custom request for keycloak IDP in f5 config.
Here is my https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/.well-known/openid-configuration (dont know if this help...) :
{ "issuer": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master", "authorization_endpoint": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/auth", "token_endpoint": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token", "token_introspection_endpoint": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect", "userinfo_endpoint": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/userinfo", "end_session_endpoint": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/logout", "jwks_uri": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/certs", "check_session_iframe": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/login-status-iframe.html", "grant_types_supported": [ "authorization_code", "implicit", "refresh_token", "password", "client_credentials" ], "response_types_supported": [ "code", "none", "id_token", "token", "id_token token", "code id_token", "code token", "code id_token token" ], "subject_types_supported": [ "public", "pairwise" ], "id_token_signing_alg_values_supported": [ "RS256" ], "id_token_encryption_alg_values_supported": [ "RSA-OAEP", "RSA1_5" ], "id_token_encryption_enc_values_supported": [ "A128GCM", "A128CBC-HS256" ], "userinfo_signing_alg_values_supported": [ "RS256", "none" ], "request_object_signing_alg_values_supported": [ "RS256", "none" ], "response_modes_supported": [ "query", "fragment", "form_post" ], "registration_endpoint": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/clients-registrations/openid-connect", "token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported": [ "private_key_jwt", "client_secret_basic", "client_secret_post", "client_secret_jwt" ], "token_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported": [ "RS256" ], "claims_supported": [ "aud", "sub", "iss", "auth_time", "name", "given_name", "family_name", "preferred_username", "email" ], "claim_types_supported": [ "normal" ], "claims_parameter_supported": false, "scopes_supported": [ "openid", "gatekeeperClientScope", "F5-APM-ClientScope", "address", "email", "microprofile-jwt", "offline_access", "phone", "profile", "roles", "web-origins" ], "request_parameter_supported": true, "request_uri_parameter_supported": true, "code_challenge_methods_supported": [ "plain", "S256" ], "tls_client_certificate_bound_access_tokens": true, "introspection_endpoint": "https://keycloak.xxxxx.lu:8443/auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token/introspect" }
Thanks in advance.
- AdayaNimbostratus
This helps,
Appreciate the effort. If you have time, would it be too much to peak at your APM setup for the OP/IdP portion for Keycloak?
- AdayaNimbostratus
Thanks for the reply. the specific implementation i'm actually looking for is the resource owner password flow. do you have the documentation you used to get this successfully working?
- JorenCNimbostratus
Adaya,
I did end up using the LinkedIn lab guide.
https://clouddocs.f5.com/training/community/iam/html/class2/module1/module1.html#task-6-linkedin-custom-provider
Do note, the most important piece is the creation of the custom requests.
Once you get this flow working using curl commands, it is pretty straight forward to set these up. Though I do not find the official doc clear.
I'll see if I can upload some screenshots tomorrow (busy days at work ;))
Regards,
Joren
- AdayaNimbostratus
i am also curious about this, has anyone got this to work?
- JorenCNimbostratus
Adaya,
I've got this working for the password flow at the moment.
The documentation is there but not to easy to figure out what goes where.. (my personal opinion)
Still looking for some time to set up the authorization code flow.
Once I get this implemented i'll try and add the setup on devcentral, stay tuned :)
Kind regards,
Joren
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com