Forum Discussion
In-Line Vs One-Arm Load balancing
Hi All,
Thank you for reading my post. I want to know the exact difference between inline load balancing and one-arm load balancing. What are the advantages and dis-advantages of choosing either of them.
Thank you, Amar
One-arm configuration is easy to deploy on the production network, but you have to use SNAT and therefore you won't be able see client's ip addresses on the server side.
- AmarC_141952Nimbostratus
Thank you for your reply.
So in Inline mode , The servers have default gateway as the Load balancer's IP. And in onearm mode , The packet is source nated , so eventually it has to go to the balancer. Is this correct ?
Yes, it is correct
- AmarC_141952Nimbostratus
Excellent. Do you know if there any relation of these configurations to the number of VIP's on Balancer. Like 1 can handle more VIP's than other.
Regards
No, it doesn't reflect any other configuration, as far as I know
- Mahmoud_Eldeeb_Cirrostratus
both setup has no relation on number of VIPs,
- Mahmoud_Eldeeb_Cirrostratus
it is only reflect how to introduce the box into your network
- f5newuser_18231Nimbostratus
Is Anybody can provide the cabling topology and configuration in GUI Active/Passive mode guide?
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com