For more information regarding the security incident at F5, the actions we are taking to address it, and our ongoing efforts to protect our customers, click here.

Forum Discussion

Jason_L_40779's avatar
Jason_L_40779
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Mar 15, 2011

Exchange 2010 RPC HA

Question,

 

 

Were implementing Exchange 2010 through our LTM hardware. I want to ensure that i have stateful failover if I do a patch, hotfix, or just a reboot/refresh. I know with OWA, and HTTPS the cookie will be stateful. However in regards to RPC being source address persistence, should I need to mirror that persistence to the stanby unit to unsure stateful failover with RPC...

 

 

Thanks,

 

 

Jayson

 

basic
getting started
new to f5

2 Replies

  • Jason_L_40779's avatar
    Jason_L_40779
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    Mar 31, 2011
    Just wondering if anyone has experience working with Exchange 2010 and RPC. Its using a wide range of ports so we use a all ports VIP *0. I'm wondering to create more of a seamless failover, if it would be best to mirror source address persistence to the standby unit. I'm going to have 8,000 mailboxes going through my 6900 LTM hardware... I have a seperate 1 GB fiber synch interface between the 2 units.
  • Cspillane_18296's avatar
    Cspillane_18296
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    Apr 06, 2011
    Hello Jayson,

     

     

    I'm not massively experienced with Exchange I am afraid but rfom the description I would say that yes, mirroring the persistence records to the standby device will be necessary.

     

     

    Chris.