Forum Discussion
Jeff_Green_4244
Nimbostratus
Nov 07, 2011Create Domino LTPA token on F5 problem
Hi,
I'm trying to use the code at
http://per.lausten.dk/blog/2009/06/how-to-create-a-ltpa-session-cookie-for-lotus-domino-using-f5.html
to create a Domino LTPA token but I am getting the following error showing on the Domino server:
Token does not lead with 0 [Single Sign-On token is invalid].
The token should begin with the version number 0123 e.g. from the code
set ltpa_version "\x00\x01\x02\x03"
However, after decoding the token and then looking at it in a hex editor the version number shows as:
C0 80 01 02 03 .......
Can somebody explain to me why the \x00 is being changed to C0 80 please?
I've experimented putting other numbers in thefirst position to see what happens e.g. \x01\x01\x02\x03 and the hex readout looks correct i.e. 01 01 02 03. It only fails when I use a \x00 in the first position.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Jeff
16 Replies
- Jeff,
are there any TCL errors in /var/log/ltm (grep TCL /var/log/ltm)?
If there are no errors, could you please add some log statements to the iRule and post the output (see /var/log/ltm) here?Final Base64 encoded token set ltpa_token_final [b64encode $ltpa_token_raw] please add these lines. binary scan $ltpa_token_raw H* ltpa_token_raw_hex log local0. "LTP_TOKEN Hex: $ltpa_token_raw_hex" log local0. "LTP_TOKEN Final: $ltpa_token_final"
If I run the code on my test system, the HEX encoded string looks good.
local/tmm info tmm[5104]: Rule rule01 : LTP_TOKEN Hex: 0001020334454237453145363445423745384545e3f09dbbff9248a638a6bfeeb876f66c52df6cb2
local/tmm info tmm[5104]: Rule rule01 : LTP_TOKEN Final: wIABAgM0RUI3RTFFNjRFQjdFOEVFw6PDsMKdwrvDv8KSSMKmOMKmwr/DrsK4dsO2bFLDn2zCsg==
Regards
Kurt Knochner - Jeff_Green_4244
Nimbostratus
Hi Kurt,
No errors are showing in the ltm log. I added the debug lines and I get the same result as you. Leading 00 is where it shoud be. So I know that part is working correctly. Thanks.
What we've now found is when the token is subsequently b64encoded, then b64decoded, the leading 00 is replaced with the C0 80. This happens on both v9.4.4 and v10.2.0.
Regards,
Jeff Green - What we've now found is when the token is subsequently b64encoded, then b64decoded, the leading 00 is replaced with the C0 80. This happens on both v9.4.4 and v10.2.0.
hm.. can you post some sample code? There is no b64decode in the original iRule, at least not for the token.
Regards
Kurt Knochner - Hi,
I'm able to reproduce what you've seen.set text "\x00\x01\x02\x03Hello World" set text_enc [b64encode $text] set text_dec [b64decode $text_enc] binary scan $text H* text_hex binary scan $text_enc H* text_enc_hex binary scan $text_dec H* text_dec_hex log local0. "Text: $text_hex" log local0. "Text encoded: $text_enc_hex" log local0. "Text decoded: $text_dec_hex"
The result:
Nov 9 03:13:54 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule rule01 : Text: 0001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 03:13:54 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule rule01 : Text encoded: 7749414241674e495a5778736279425862334a735a413d3d
Nov 9 03:13:54 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule rule01 : Text decoded: c08001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
So, yes there is a c080 in front of the text and it only happens if the initial string starts with \x00.
This looks like a bug. Maybe something with internal string handling. Please open a case with my example and ask support what's going wrong. It would be nice if you could update this thread as soon as you get a reply from support.
Thanks!
Regards
Kurt Knochner - nitass
Employee
why does it seem okay to me?[root@ve1023:Active] config b version|grep -iA 1 version BIG-IP Version 10.2.3 112.0 Final Edition [root@ve1023:Active] config b rule myrule list rule myrule { when RULE_INIT { set text "\x00\x01\x02\x03Hello World" set text_enc [b64encode $text] set text_dec [b64decode $text_enc] binary scan $text H* text_hex binary scan $text_enc H* text_enc_hex binary scan $text_dec H* text_dec_hex log local0. "Text: $text_hex" log local0. "Text encoded: $text_enc_hex" log local0. "Text decoded: $text_dec_hex" } } [root@ve1023:Active] config grep -i myrule /var/log/ltm Nov 8 23:54:37 local/ve1023 err mcpd[3752]: 01020066:3: The requested rule (myrule) already exists in partition Common. Nov 8 23:54:37 local/tmm info tmm[4766]: Rule myrule : Text: 0001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64 Nov 8 23:54:37 local/tmm info tmm[4766]: Rule myrule : Text encoded: 414145434130686c6247787649466476636d786b Nov 8 23:54:37 local/tmm info tmm[4766]: Rule myrule : Text decoded: 0001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64 - why does it seem okay to me?
maybe the TMOS version you've used, 10.2.3. I've tested with 10.2.2 and Jeff with 9.4.4 and 10.2.0.
EDIT: I ran the test again and this time it gave the correct result. Strange. I'll try to figure out in which cases it will produce the wrong result.
Regards
Kurt Knochner Hi,
the append function in the original iRule might cause the problem.
Nov 9 03:49:44 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : WITHOUT append
Nov 9 03:49:44 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text: 0001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 03:49:44 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text encoded: 414145434130686c6247787649466476636d786b
Nov 9 03:49:44 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text decoded: 0001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 03:49:57 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : WITH append
Nov 9 03:49:57 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text: 0001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 03:49:57 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text encoded: 7749414241674e495a5778736279425862334a735a413d3d
Nov 9 03:49:57 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text decoded: c08001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64[root@lb01:Active] log b rule irule03 list rule irule03 { when RULE_INIT { log local0. "WITHOUT append" set text "\x00\x01\x02\x03Hello World" log local0. "WITH append" set hello "\x00\x01\x02\x03Hello World" set text {} append text $hello set text_enc [b64encode $text] set text_dec [b64decode $text_enc] binary scan $text H* text_hex binary scan $text_enc H* text_enc_hex binary scan $text_dec H* text_dec_hex log local0. "Text: $text_hex" log local0. "Text encoded: $text_enc_hex" log local0. "Text decoded: $text_dec_hex" } }
Is this a bug?EDIT: Something is wrong with the string when it is initialized as an empty string with 'set text {}'. Anyway, if I change the init to -- set text '' --, the output looks like this, and it's still wrong (c080 in the string).
Nov 9 03:54:20 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : WITH append
Nov 9 03:54:20 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text: 27270001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 03:54:20 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text encoded: 4a796641674145434130686c6247787649466476636d786b
Nov 9 03:54:20 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text decoded: 2727c08001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
So, it's only a problem, if the string is initialized as an empty string and if one uses 'append' to add other strings to it. I'm not sure if this is O.K.
EDIT2: Furthermore, the problem only exists, if the appended string starts with \x00.
Nov 9 04:20:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : WITH append
Nov 9 04:20:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text: 01020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 04:20:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text encoded: 415149445347567362473867563239796247513d
Nov 9 04:20:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03 : Text decoded: 01020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
To sum it up.
1.) create a string that starts with \x00
2.) initialize another string with "set string2 {}"
3.) append the first string to the second string. 'append string2 $string1'
4.) b64encode and then b64decode string2 and the result will contain (or start with) c080.
This really looks like a bug.Regards
Kurt Knochner- Hi,
it's a more general "problem" and related to the concatenation of strings, where the first string starts with \x00. 0x00 would be the terminator for a string in C. I'm not sure how TCL handles that. The strange thing is, that binary scan shows the correct value, while b64encode followed by a b64decode leads to the additional c080.rule irule03a { when RULE_INIT { set hello "Hello World" log local0. "WITH leading \\x00" set prefix "\x00\x01\x02\x03" log local0. "WITHOUT leading \\x00" set prefix "\x01\x02\x03" set text "${prefix}${hello}" log local0. "WITHOUT concatenation" set text "\x00\x01\x02\x03HelloWorld" set text_enc [b64encode $text] set text_dec [b64decode $text_enc] binary scan $text H* text_hex binary scan $text_enc H* text_enc_hex binary scan $text_dec H* text_dec_hex log local0. "Text: $text" log local0. "Text hex: $text_hex" log local0. "Text encoded: $text_enc_hex" log local0. "Text decoded: $text_dec_hex" } }
Nov 9 04:45:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : WITHOUT concatenation
Nov 9 04:45:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text: ÀHelloWorld
Nov 9 04:45:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text hex: 0001020348656c6c6f576f726c64
Nov 9 04:45:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text encoded: 414145434130686c62477876563239796247513d
Nov 9 04:45:36 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text decoded: 0001020348656c6c6f576f726c64
Nov 9 04:46:01 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : WITH leading \x00
Nov 9 04:46:01 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text: ÀHello World
Nov 9 04:46:01 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text hex: 0001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 04:46:01 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text encoded: 7749414241674e495a5778736279425862334a735a413d3d
Nov 9 04:46:01 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text decoded: c08001020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 04:46:13 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : WITHOUT leading \x00
Nov 9 04:46:13 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text: Hello World
Nov 9 04:46:13 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text hex: 01020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Nov 9 04:46:13 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text encoded: 415149445347567362473867563239796247513d
Nov 9 04:46:13 local/tmm info tmm[5158]: Rule irule03a : Text decoded: 01020348656c6c6f20576f726c64
Regards
Kurt Knochner - Minn_62043
Cirrostratus
From http://wiki.tcl.tk/1211
"In orthodox UTF-8, a NUL byte(\x00) is represented by a NUL byte. Plain enough. But in Tcl we sometimes want NUL bytes inside "binary" strings (e.g. image data), without them terminating it as a real NUL byte does. To represent a NUL byte without any physical NUL bytes, we treat it like a character above ASCII, which must be a minimum two bytes long:"
(110)00000 (10)000000 => C0 80
I guess the function fails to convert it back. - I guess the function fails to convert it back.
sounds reasonable. Thanks for the link!
@Jeff: With all that information you should be able to open a support case.
Regards
Kurt Knochner
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects
