Big-IP ASM and websockets

You will still need to use the workaround. Websockets support only covers LTM. Depending on what other iRules you use, the HTTP::disable and HTTP::enable functions might be eligible for removal (you'll have to test it for yourself). The ASM::disable & ASM::enable MyPolicyName are still required, and so is the iRule workaround. You can also use an LTM Policy (Local Traffic > Policy) for the purpose.

Hello It worked well with the iRule! What is the difference between using iRule & LTM Policies in my Use Case?

LTM Policy is visually appealing and easier to understand, typically preferred by "jack-of-all-trades" network admins. Deeply specialized F5 engineers prefer to use iRules because they can be used to solve problems where LTM Policy is lacking in functionality. You can also use a combination of both, no ultimate right or wrong here - do what makes the most sense to you.

I see! I will stick to iRules then, as it seems more flexible and have much more samples to troubleshoot! Regards, Georges