timeout
22 TopicsIdle-Timeout doesn't work
Dear community, I need to setup a specific Idle-Timeout for my VS, so I created a new TCP profile as per attached picture and setup the idle timeout as 1800 seconds (I tried also with "Indefinite" value): Then I associated this profile the the VS: The problem is that F5 still disconnect clients after 5 minutes/300 seconds. F5 is on 16.1.3.3 software version. Did I missed something else? The related KB doesn't specify anything else for idle-timeout Thank you Lucas54Views0likes3CommentsUnstable communication L2 and ARP
Hi, I have a very wired problem with one of our F5. This is a single armed partition, so the LB VS and pool members and everything is all on the same L2 network segment. The thing is, the pool memebers (four) are going down every other minute, and then come back after a while, maybe a few minutes. Digging into the issue, I found that I am not able to ping those nodes from the F5 tmsh when they are down, while I can ping them from my workstation just fine. Just the F5 looses communication for a reason. I checked the ARP table, and the entries for those hosts are in there with the right MAC address. However, when the problem occurs, as soon as I clear the ARP table entry for any of these hosts, I am immideately able to ping them again - for some minutes, then the ping dies again. Clearing the ARP again brings them back to life right away - and so on. As I said, I can see the correct ARP table entry when the ping is not working, so I dont get why clearing the ARP entry brings them back to life. All other communication to those hosts is just running fine, e.g. I run a RDP session from my workstation to them which just runs fine while they are not ping-able from the tmsh. Question is, whats up with the F5 it looses communication. I tried to add static ARP entries for those pool members as I am running out of ideas, but that didnt change anything. Also, we have the same set up in our dev environment, same F5, same versions, all the same, which just runs fine. Any help or ideas are appreciated, Tx&Greetings, JoSolved50Views0likes3CommentsRedirect on user browser inactivity on LTM VIP
We have a type Standard F5 LTM VIP (no APM, no ASM, just LTM) with a pool of application servers. Only SSL, TCP and HTTP profiles are applied to that VIP. Connection is made by browser to URL https://www.mysite.com/mypage and web page content displayed. All good at this point. Then a user is idle for 20 minutes doing nothing. We want in this case of inactivity to send http redirect from F5 to a user browser to redirectto https://www.mysite.com Again this is a very basic VIP; beside TCP profile idle timeout I don't see any other posisble timeouts and TCP idle timeout is totally different from what we want to do... Any suggestion how our goal can be achieved? Thanlk yuo in advance!471Views0likes3CommentsAPM :: Async Error :: Session deleted due to user inactivity
Anybody run into this error before? Been chasing "Session deleted due to user inactivity" when the user swears that it disconnects in the middle of their session while they are actively working. Saw this in the informational logs and wondered if it was related... 2018-03-29 01:29:19 /Common/main:Common:xxxxxxxx: {61b5.C} An exception is thrown: AsyncError:1: SuppliedUnexpectedAny915Views0likes3CommentsBIG-IP : device-side timeout applied to iControl operations ?
F5 BIG-IP LTM VE v11.4.0 on ESXi The iControl API classes accept a timeout parameter - which to be safe I set to 3600000 ms = 1 hr ( how to set to infinite ? ) However calls to LocalLB.DataGroupFile.set_file_path() API ( that when successful complete in under 10 mins ) sometimes return this error : The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a send. Is it possible that BIG-IP is applying its own internal timeout to iControl requests ? If so, how to configure my BIG-IP device's internal timeout ?229Views0likes0CommentsTomcat pool member not replying to the syn from F5
I have an F5 LTM sitting in front of two tomcat servers which host 4 applications. When I initially create the pools and add the members to the LTM I can hit all applications. This is the weird part, after an undetermined amount of time the tomcat servers stop responding to SYN requests sent by the F5. Makes me think it is some type of time out issue. I can still hit the tomcat servers directly and can curl pages on the tomcat servers via the CLI of the F5. Here is a TCP dump from the F5 when I attempt to access the one of the tomcat applications via a VIP. 2014-01-17 15:38:50.50032420.980713017710.192.209.110.192.209.11TCP808165281209177OUT s1/tmm3 : 65281 > 8081 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=4380 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSval=2716693891 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 I have disabled tcp_timestamps and tcp_window_scaling on the tomcat host. Any ideas? I have been working on this for about a week and have hit a wall.Solved464Views0likes2CommentsiRule to increase tcp timeout for given client
Hi, I need to increase a tcp timeout value. when a certain client connects to VIP. I did this: when CLIENT_ACCEPTED { if { [IP::addr [IP::client_addr] equals 10.10.10.10] } { TCP::idletime 600 } } But it resulted in an error: "increase_idle_timeout:3: error: [undefined procedure: TCP::idletime][TCP::idletime 600]" On the other hand this was accepted: when CLIENT_ACCEPTED { if { [IP::addr [IP::client_addr] equals 10.10.10.10] } { IP::idle_timeout 600 } } What is the difference between IP::idle_timeout and TCP::idletime? I'm running 11.5.7Solved913Views0likes1CommentInactivity Timeouts
We have an environment set up where we need to specify different inactivity timeouts depending on the user and/or incoming connection IP. I have an iRule that gets run on a new authenticated session that changes the session timeouts I'm aware of... ACCESS::session data set session.inactivity_timeout 10800 ACCESS::session data set session.max_session_timeout 10800 Even though this should be for 3hrs, we have users that are getting timed out after 15 minutes (which is the Access Policy default. Is there a different/better way that we should be changing the inactivity timeout? Thanks!359Views0likes9CommentsBIG-IP : SystemConfigSync timeout
F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition v11.4.1 (Build 635.0) LTM on ESXi I'm working with iControl API : var systemConfigSync = new SystemConfigSync(host, username, password, timeout); SystemConfigSync.upload_configuration() What is an appropriate value for timeout ?230Views0likes1CommentTACACS+ Timeout
Hi all, I have been successfully authentication to my F5 estate using TACACS handing off to AD for many years. I have now added another layer by integrated with my MFA platform but cannot figure out how to alter/set timeouts for the MFA authentication. My configuration for TACACS is: auth tacacs system-auth { protocol ip secret xxxxx servers { x.x.x.x y.y.y.y } service ppp } I have set the timeout with: list auth tacacs system-auth timeout auth tacacs system-auth { timeout 15 } When I connect, I am prompted to MFA for both CLI & GUI. However, if I wait for 30 seconds, 1 minute, etc. the MFA session is still waiting & authenticates me when I accept the MFA challenge. Can anyone out there suggest what I'm missing in making the timeout time me out?1.1KViews0likes3Comments