cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

UIE Persistance Records

felix001_29321
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

Im using a universial persistance profile with an irule attached.

 

However when I look at the persistance records I see that the client addr is not populated.

 

Any ideas

 

root@f5ltm(Active)(tmos) show ltm persistence persist-records all-properties

 

Sys::Persistent Connections

 

universal - 172.16.100.10:80 - 192.168.1.31:80

 

------------------------------------------------

 

TMM 0

 

Mode universal

 

Key e2b454e150fb4d600244180790d86eb8

 

Age (sec.) 9

 

Virtual Name VS-172.16.100.10-80

 

Virtual Addr 172.16.100.10:80

 

Node Addr 192.168.1.31:80

 

Pool Name POOL-172.16.100.254

 

Client Addr ::

 

4 REPLIES 4

Chris_Phillips
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus
well as you're not persisting on the client address, it's just not applicable here.

felix001_29321
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

True but I have another F5 with this same setup showing this value. Even though cookie persist is being used within UIE. Any ideas ?? I thought it may be down to SNAT but on testing this doesnt appear to be the case.

 

 

Thanks,

 

felix001_29321
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus
Does anyone have any idea about this ?

nitass
F5 Employee
F5 Employee
is client ip changed after persistence record is created? i suggest you open a support case if you want to know whether it is bug or expected behavior.

 

 

anyway, you know since persistence is not based on client ip, this won't cause an issue.