Forum Discussion
Ev-_28244
Nimbostratus
Sep 11, 2008VLAN Group ARP Issues
Hello all,
I have a very interesting issue with one of my configurations using an LTM. Due to some environment limitations - and timeframes, I had to resort to inserting the LTM into an existing network and establishing a VLAN Group, bridging two VLANs.
This configuration is currently in production, with no issues at all. However in my DEV/TEST area I have some problems with ARP and the VLAN association.
Outline of the configuration;
LTM DEV/TEST
Version : BIG-IP 9.4.3 Build 1.4 Final
VLANs : External (int 1.1), Internal (int 1.2)
VLAN Group : DMZ-Bridge (1.1, 1.2)
Transparency Mode : Translucent
Bridge all traffic : Enabled
VLAN IDs : External, 4094 / Internal, 4093 / DMZ-Bridge, 4094
Self-IP : 192.168.0.2
VIP : 192.168.0.5:*
Pool : 192.168.0.10, 192.168.0.20
See the attached diagram for a complete picture.
Now, the servers reside on Internal interface.
Everything runs fine for about 5-6hours then suddenly my servers start failing their health checks and the F5 drops connections from the VIP.
After doing some investigation I have discovered the following;
1) Every 300secs (ARP entry timeout) the VLAN that the servers ARP entry is associated to changes. It can move from VLAN 4093 to 4094, on occassion the ARP timeout will only be 30seconds. This can be seen by running "b arp show"
2) After about 5-6hours for the next ARP table update the F5 sends the arp request out, however it is ignoring the response. The result is the health checks then fail. About 25 - 30 seconds later it all comes good again. By this time, client connections have been dropped.
I have a workaround in TEST/DEV by creating a static ARP entry for the servers, the only issue with this is I cannot associate it to a VLAN apart from the VLAN bridge so any traffic destinated for the servers gets sent out both VLANs in the bridge rather than just one.
I do not have this issue in PROD. PROD is the same with the exception of;
F5 Version : BIG-IP 9.4.1 Build 29.2
Switch : Cisco 3750
This has got me a bit stumped, any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Evan.
- Pavel_Sestak_69
Nimbostratus
It seems to me like version/revision problem - we have upgraded a lot before getting this up. I would try to get both environments to the same builds - this should help a lot. I would also try to get second switch and make group transparent (if possible) - just to check.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects