Forum Discussion
VIPRION with Multiple Blades
i have 2 VIPRION Boxes , each with 2 blades , i want to do the following :
connect physical connections only to one blade at each VIPRION , while i will leave the other blade with no interfaces ( except the management port )
is this doable ?
also i will establish HA cables between first blade at VIPRION1 & first Blade at VIPRION2 ... will not establish HA between the other 2 blades becsuae i want failover to depend on primary balde only .... is waht i'm doing doable ?
4 Replies
- SSHSSH_97332
Nimbostratus
i mean by that , i will leave the secondary blade at each VIPRION with no connections at alll ( even no HA connection ) ... just installed it to increase the throughput ? - nitass
Employee
connect physical connections only to one blade at each VIPRION , while i will leave the other blade with no interfaces ( except the management port )it is okay but if that blade is down, you will lose all connections.
also i will establish HA cables between first blade at VIPRION1 & first Blade at VIPRION2 ... will not establish HA between the other 2 blades becsuae i want failover to depend on primary balde onlyi do not know but i feel it may not be the proper configuration. i think you can achieve this using ha-group (e.g. if interface on specific blade is down, do failover). anyway, i think it could work.
- SSHSSH_97332
Nimbostratus
But what are the other options i have , i have only one connection for Up link Router & One connection for Down link to the Core switch
if using HA cables between secondary blades is mandatory , this means that i need to connect network ports to it as well ... which will not work at my case - nitass
Employee
But what are the other options i have , i have only one connection for Up link Router & One connection for Down link to the Core switch if using HA cables between secondary blades is mandatory , this means that i need to connect network ports to it as well ... which will not work at my case
understood. anyway, it is the best practice to configure failover multicast address or unicast mesh. so, i think it may be better to use ha-group or vlan failsafe to trigger failover when interface (trunk) is down or there is no traffic on vlan.
sol13915: Configuring network failover for redundant VIPRION systems (11.x) http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/13000/900/sol13915.html
please be noted that there is a known issue on vlan failsafe in 11.1.0, 11.2.0 and 11.2.1.
sol14022: The BIG-IP system may fail to activate the VLAN failsafe action http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/14000/000/sol14022.html
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com