Forum Discussion
genseek_32178
Nimbostratus
Jun 20, 2012VIP fails Telnet but responds to ICMP
F5A telnet 10.45.2.10 80 Trying 10.45.2.10...
telnet: connect to address 10.45.2.10: No route to host telnet:
Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
F5A ping 10.45.2.10
PING 10.45.2.10 (10.45.2.10 ) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.45.2.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=2.77 ms
64 bytes from 10.45.2.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.990 ms
virtual vs_80 { translate address disable translate service disable pool pool80 destination 10.45.2.10:www ip protocol tcp persist persist80 profiles fastl4_80 {} vlans 80 enable }
Pool members are showing as - inactive down and not responding to telnet on port 80.
However, memebrs are pinging from F5.
Any ideas..what route is missing here when VIP is pinging?
25 Replies
- genseek_32178
Nimbostratus
nitass,
tcmpdump would be same ..with corrected IPs
tcpdump -nni 0.0 -X -s0 host 10.45.2.20 and port 80 and host 10.45.2.5
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
05:20:55.103121 IP 10.45.2.20.36357 > 10.45.2.5.80: S 3089357006:3089357006(0) win 5840 out slot1/tmm1 lis=
0x0000: 036d 0800 4500 003c 7233 4000 4006 85ec .m..E..
0x0010: 0af5 1645 0af5 166e 8e05 1f54 b823 d8ce ...E...n...T...
0x0020: 0000 0000 a002 16d0 a359 0000 0204 05b4 .........Y......
0x0030: 0402 080a 382f d4be 0000 0000 0103 0307 ....8/..........
0x0040: 0114 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................
0x0050: 0000 0000 0000 - nitass
Employee
i am a bit lost. i thought virtual address is 10.45.2.10 and pool member ip is 10.45.2.20. also, translate address is disabled. how come was 10.245.22.110 in tcpdump?? - genseek_32178
Nimbostratus
Ah ! .am sorry nitass..
indeed..
virtual is - 10.45.2.10,
pool member is - 10.45.2.20
plz ignore 10.245.x.x ..it was my bad.
about translate address disabled - i ve working config..where this is disabled. - nitass
Employee
about translate address disabled - i ve working config..where this is disabledyes, it is correct. translate address is disabled since you are using npath configuration.
plz ignore 10.245.x.x ..it was my bad.so, you will do tcpdump and check it again, won't you? - genseek_32178
Nimbostratus
No..
tcpdump would be same ..with corrected IPs
tcpdump -nni 0.0 -X -s0 host 10.45.2.20 and port 80 and host 10.45.2.5
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
05:20:55.103121 IP 10.45.2.20.36357 > 10.45.2.5.80: S 3089357006:3089357006(0) win 5840 out slot1/tmm1 lis=
0x0000: 036d 0800 4500 003c 7233 4000 4006 85ec .m..E..
0x0010: 0af5 1645 0af5 166e 8e05 1f54 b823 d8ce ...E...n...T... - nitass
Employee
05:20:55.103121 IP 10.45.2.20.36357 > 10.45.2.5.80: S 3089357006:3089357006(0) win 5840 out slot1/tmm1 lis= how come 10.45.2.5 was listening on port 80??
are we looking at correct packet?? - genseek_32178
Nimbostratus
my bad..again..am sorry..nitass...handling too many issues ...at the moment.....
correct tcpdump is as below
tcpdump -nni 0.0 -X -s0 host 10.45.2.20 and port 80 and host 10.45.2.5
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
05:20:55.103121 IP 10.45.2.5.36357 > 10.45.2.20.80: S 3089357006:3089357006(0) win 5840 out slot1/tmm1 lis=
0x0000: 036d 0800 4500 003c 7233 4000 4006 85ec .m..E..
0x0010: 0af5 1645 0af5 166e 8e05 1f54 b823 d8ce ...E...n...T... - nitass
Employee
i am totally confused.
first of all, i understand this is the current virtual configuration.
virtual vs_80 { translate address disable translate service disable pool pool80 destination 10.45.2.10:www ip protocol tcp persist persist80 profiles fastl4_80 {} vlans 80 enable }1. since translate address is disabled, how come destination ip in tcpdump was 10.45.2.20?
2. i thought this is npath configuration but source ip in tcpdump is translated (snat) to selfip. is it npath configuration indeed?
again, are we looking at correct packet? - genseek_32178
Nimbostratus
nitass,
10.45.2.20 is pool member
10.45.2.5 - Self IP in this vlan.
the tcpdump capture is for sending port 80 traffic to pool member - 10.45.2.20...from source as Self ip - 10.45.2.5..to see if the pool member is responding on that port.
do u see anything wrong in the tcpdump syntax or output? - nitass
Employee
do u see anything wrong in the tcpdump syntax or output?the virtual server configuration and tcpdump output is not corresponding (as i mentioned above). i suspect we are looking at the wrong packet.
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects