Forum Discussion
Andrea_Frances1
Nimbostratus
Sep 07, 2005Use of Irules in persistence profile and vs
Hi All,
I'm having seriuos problems understanding the difference (if any) between the use of iRules directly in a virtual server and "indirectly" through a persistence profile.
Let...
unRuleY_95363
Sep 08, 2005Historic F5 Account
You've asked a very good question.
There actually isn't any difference in terms of how the rules are evaluated.
The difference is really how you want to manage the rule.
For example, if the rule is really about setting up persistence and a particular virtual simply wants to use that persistence, then putting the rule on the persistence profile might make more sense. This way, if you need to change the rule to include some virtual specific stuff like which pool(s) to use, you can keep that in a separate rule that's only attached to the virtual. Then if you later need to modify either rule, you are not affecting the other. Another case might be that you want to add or remove that persistence on a given virtual, in which case it might make more sense to add or remove the persistence profile instead of the rule.
So, in summary, there really isn't any difference in how the rule is evaluated and the difference purely allows for your choice of management.
Hope that helps.
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects