Forum Discussion
Helena_101649
Nimbostratus
May 28, 2013Route Domains and Parent Domain
Hi,
I want to setup a scenario similar to the one described in LTM Implementations manual chapter "Web Hosting Multiple Customers Using Route Domains", but with a third route domain which could fo...
Helena_101649
Nimbostratus
Aug 06, 2015Hi,
No, finally we dismiss the idea. We achived a sort of routing isolation between backends using differents Forwarings Virtual Servers for each VLAN, and restricting the inbound vlan to the Internet facing vlan. This is a simplified example:
VLAN1
10.10.10.0 | |
-----------| | VLAN_FRONT | |
|LTM|-------------|Router |--> Outside
VLAN2 | | 30.30.30.0 |30.30.30.1|
20.20.20.0 | | | |
-----------| |
ltm virtual /Common/FORWARDING_IN_VLAN1 {
destination /Common/10.10.10.0:0
ip-forward
mask 255.255.255.0
profiles {
/Common/fastL4_NoReset { }
}
source 0.0.0.0/0
translate-address disabled
translate-port disabled
vlans {
/Common/VLAN_FRONT
}
vlans-enabled
}
ltm virtual /Common/FORWARDING_IN_VLAN2{
destination /Common/20.20.20.0:0
ip-forward
mask 255.255.255.0
profiles {
/Common/fastL4_NoReset { }
}
source 0.0.0.0/0
translate-address disabled
translate-port disabled
vlans {
/Common/VLAN_FRONT
}
vlans-enabled
}
ltm virtual /Common/FORWARDING_OUT_VLAN1 {
destination /Common/any:0
ip-forward
mask any
profiles {
/Common/fastL4_NoReset { }
}
rules {
/Common/RUTAS_OUT_VLAN1
}
source 0.0.0.0/0
translate-address disabled
translate-port disabled
vlans {
/Common/VLAN_1
}
vlans-enabled
}
ltm virtual /Common/FORWARDING_OUT_VLAN2 {
destination /Common/any:0
ip-forward
mask any
profiles {
/Common/fastL4_NoReset { }
}
rules {
/Common/RUTAS_OUT_VLAN2
}
source 0.0.0.0/0
translate-address disabled
translate-port disabled
vlans {
/Common/VLAN_2
}
vlans-enabled
}
ltm rule /Common/RUTAS_OUT_VLAN1 {
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {
node 30.30.30.1
}
ltm rule /Common/RUTAS_OUT_VLAN2 {
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {
node 30.30.30.1
}
We use different iRules for outbound routing because actually we have more than one Internet facing network. All objects reside in partition Common. Next step will be to use vCMP to implement two different virtual LTMs, but we are not in a hurry since we don't have any issue with current configuration.
Regards
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects