Forum Discussion
Replacing LTMs in GTM Server List
Thank you for the granular back up suggestion. I've put that to use extensively while migrating the LTMs to their new platform. I was planning on keeping mulitple backups within reach during this reconfiguration.
I do not intend to delete the servers -- ServerDC1, ServerDC2 -- however. I intend to delete the devices under the Servers. Here's what the config looks like from 'tmsh list gtm server ServerDC1`
gtm server ServerDC1 {
addresses {
10.10.10.1 {
device-name LTMDC1-1
}
10.10.10.2 {
device-name "LTMDC1-1 Peer"
}
}
datacenter DC1
devices {
LTMDC1-1 {
addresses {
10.10.10.1 { }
}
}
"LTMDC1-1 Peer" {
addresses {
10.10.10.2 { }
}
}
}
monitor bigip
product bigip
virtual-servers {
/Common/virtual1 {
destination 1.1.1.1:https
}
/Common/virtual2 {
destination 1.1.1.2:https
}
/Common/virtual3 {
destination 1.1.1.3:https
}
and so on....
This suggests to me that I can delete one device, and the other device will continue to feed the same VSs to GTM. Afterall, if the active member of a LTM HA pair crashes and burns, and the standby takes over, the standby will feed the same VS status data to GTM, continuing to populate the Server's virtual-servers configuration. Yes? The thought that triggered posting this note was: Will GTM act differently between two different scenarios, 1) iquery comms are down from one of a pair of HA devices, and 2) a device, one of two in an HA pair, has been administratively deleted? I suppose should the latter scenario cause the virtuals under ServerDC1 to be deleted, I will restore them from backup.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com