Forum Discussion
Pool member showing as force disabled after only setting the session enabled state to disabled
- Jun 18, 2014
This is a bit gray for me as well, as I do not understand the difference between SESSION_STATUS_DISABLED(which I don't think I have ever seen) and SESSION_STATUS_FORCED_DISABLED, but it should work as you expect and be equivalent to a Disable state in the gui(allow persistent connections but not new ones)
I think the common confusion is thinking FORCED_DISABLED is equivalent to the gui Forced Offline. Both the monitor and the session must be down to be Forced Offline(only active connections)
Thanks! I did more testing, checking the session status through code after updating through the web interface, and confirmed that get_member_session_status returned SESSION_STATUS_FORCED_DISABLED for a normal disable. I also confirmed the opposite - setting it to disabled via set_member_session_enabled_state showed as the standard disable through the web interface. Thanks for clearing that up!
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
