node will not take traffic when added back into pool

Is the node address enabled and marked up? How about the pool member? You can check using 'b node 1.1.1.1 show' and 'b pool POOL_NAME show'.

 

 

If both are not showing down, then it might be persistence. Which persistence method(s) are you using on the VIP? Which load balancing algorithm are you using on the pool?

 

 

Aaron

node states unknown (available) and the pool member is enabled....and up. State is enabled allow all traffic.

 

 

resoures says the persistance uses a persistance profile, but i cant find where that is. I also cant find the type of load balancing. Sorry.

 

 

If you can still help thanks.

node states unknown (available) and the pool member is enabled....and up. State is enabled allow all traffic.

 

 

resoures says the persistance uses a persistance profile, but i cant find where that is. I also cant find the type of load balancing. Sorry.

 

 

If you can still help thanks.

Can you post the output from 'b virtual VIP_NAME list' and 'b pool POOL_NAME list' where you replace the NAME portion with the actual object names. Make sure to anonymize the info if it's sensitive.

 

 

Aaron

I am using the GUI not cli. and the persistence mode is source address affinity.

You can also run bigpipe commands from the bigpipe shell in the GUI under System | Console.

 

 

Can you post anonymized copies of the VIP and pool config? Can you also check to see if there are more than two client IP addresses listed in the source address persistence records under Overview | Statistics | Statistics Type: Persistence Records or from the actual command line using 'b persist all show all'?

 

 

Thanks,

 

Aaron

persistance type is source address affinity and only the 2 ip nodes show up in the statistics under persistance.

persistance type is source address affinity and only the 2 ip nodes show up in the statistics under persistance.

If there are only two client IPs making requests to the VIP, then the source address persistence would ensure they get persisted to the two pool members. Can you test by making a request to the VIP from a third IP address and see if it gets load balanced to the third pool member?

 

 

[edit: actually, you wrote the two node IP's. Do you see more than two unique client IP addresses in the persistence records?]

 

 

Aaron

i stated that incorrectly; there are more than two clients requesting. There are only 2 servers responding.