Forum Discussion
JRahm
Admin
Oct 03, 2005Mutator LINK::qos and IP::tos syntax
WHat is the syntax to set LINK::qos and IP::tos? Also, if we are not using HTTP, what response event will work? Thanks in advance!
Instead of relying on the switch infrastructure to classify traffic, I'd rather classify it on the BigIP and just set up a trust boundary on my switches.
- unRuleY_95363Historic F5 AccountYou should simply need to add the value. eg:
LINK::qos 3
- JRahm
Admin
I'll give try in the morning, didn't see that take. Also, I need it applied in the return path to the client, not on the server side. - unRuleY_95363Historic F5 AccountSetting the link qos or IP tos on the clientside will only set it for egress on that side. You can alternatively specify "clientside" or "serverside" on the command to further indicate the side it should effect. eg:
will set it for the serverside egress traffic regardless of the event it is done in. In your example, to set the clientside egress qos, you can either set it in CLIENT_ACCEPTED or another clientside event or use "LINK::qos 3 clientside" in a serverside event.LINK::qos 3 serverside
- JRahm
Admin
I am getting the following error:01070151:3: Rule [Firewall_Select-rule] error:when CLIENT_ACCEPTED { if { [IP::addr [IP::remote_addr] equals "10.10.1.0/24"] } { LINK::qos 3 clientside use pool Firewall_Select-pool member 10.29.10.5 } elseif { [IP::addr [IP::remote_addr] equals "10.10.2.0/24"] } { use pool Firewall_Select-pool member 10.29.20.5 } elseif { [IP::addr [IP::remote_addr] equals "10.10.3.0/24"] } { use pool Firewall_Select-pool member 10.29.30.5 } else { discard log "Discarding packets from [IP::remote_addr]" } }
- drteeth_127330Historic F5 AccountI think the clientside specifier goes before the value. For example, LINK::qos clientside 3.
- JRahm
Admin
Uh, I don't think so: - unRuleY_95363Historic F5 AccountWhat are you using to print the DSCP and COS above?
- JRahm
Admin
Do you know of any working examples of setting this? Nothing I've tried makes a difference. tcpdump shows 0 in the dscp offset (viewed in ethereal) no matter what I try. Thanks. - JRahm
Admin
Case C229092 created this morning. Thanks. - Michael_FalkenrHistoric F5 AccountI have a very large project whose main requirement is having the ability to direct traffic based on the entire DSCP value. I just want to confirmation this functionality exists in BIGIP and there will not be any issues with directing traffic based on the DSCP value. Based on this post it appears this is supported but I'd just like confirmation.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects