Forum Discussion
brad_11440
Jan 15, 2009Nimbostratus
FastL4 vs Optimized TCP Profiles
We run active/standby 6400 (platform D63a) LTM's for our production applications. They are accessed via clients on a private network with an average latency around 80ms. Nearly all of our virtual se...
- Jan 20, 2009Maybe it's about the right time to have you post your VIP config from the bigip.conf. It's possible you have other settings applied to the VIP which conflict with a FastL4 profile??? Also it might be helpful to paste the values of the TCP profile you have applied.
smp_86112
Jan 21, 2009Cirrostratus
Thanks for the details on the initial window.
So...back to the original question...given the config info provided, can anyone see why flipping the VS to FastL4 broke his app? I don't have much experience with these types of Virtual Servers, so I don't see what broke. I wonder if the LTM can't process the iRule, but the VS looks like it has a default pool so not sure if that's what the problem was.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects