Forum Discussion
Chris_Phillips
Jan 26, 2012Nimbostratus
Does LB_Failed have the same criteria as using an HTTP Fallback Host?
Nice quick one... Is there any difference at all between when the LB_FAILED event fires and an HTTP Fallback Host configured on an HTTP profile would fire? We occasionally have...
Chris_Phillips
Jan 27, 2012Nimbostratus
I have retransmits set to 3, But I think that that table is not at all correct. I did a test on a dev system on 10.2.0 and just saw retries (tcpdump) every 3 seconds until it hit the max, so with a fake pool member which would never connect, LB_FAILED always fired on 12001ms (well... ish). No sign of an incremental back off whatsoever.
We've found that these blips are apparently all on members on a single physical host (but with multiple IP's), and so far these seem to only be on Solaris 10 v490 boxes, which are a significant minority of the estate, and we can also see all http traffic go awol for this brief time period... very strange. Feels arp-y to me, but who knows... But it doesn't look like an LTM / TMOS issue at heart.
Can you think of a scenario where these LB_FAILED events would be firing on such vague times, when the members appear to be freezing in some way? I'm thinking it would need to be a RST as if it were not something coming from the server, but delayed, then the LB_FAILED's would still be firing based on retry intervals.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects