Forum Discussion
BIG-IP HA over WAN - Is it a recommended practice?
- Jan 08, 2016
It's not explicitly discouraged as far as I know, you just need to be aware of potential latency issues. Since network failover works by heartbeats sent across the configured failover link, you have to beware that packet loss or excessive delays may trigger unwanted failovers, and even potentially "split-brain" scenarios, where both devices think for brief moments that their peer has gone down, and so assume active role (active-active).
There is a DB key that allows to configure how long the system waits before declaring it's peer dead:
. Default value is 3 seconds, and this assumes devices in the same data centre. You might want to tweak this a little higher to account for the increased distance. With the value set at 3 seconds, it will take 3 seconds to trigger a failover if the peer is truly down. This means at most 3 seconds of no device actively able to handle traffic. Raising this higher increases this window, but also helps mitigate the risk of split-brain due to transient network issues.failover.nettimeoutsec
It's not explicitly discouraged as far as I know, you just need to be aware of potential latency issues. Since network failover works by heartbeats sent across the configured failover link, you have to beware that packet loss or excessive delays may trigger unwanted failovers, and even potentially "split-brain" scenarios, where both devices think for brief moments that their peer has gone down, and so assume active role (active-active).
There is a DB key that allows to configure how long the system waits before declaring it's peer dead:
failover.nettimeoutsec
. Default value is 3 seconds, and this assumes devices in the same data centre. You might want to tweak this a little higher to account for the increased distance. With the value set at 3 seconds, it will take 3 seconds to trigger a failover if the peer is truly down. This means at most 3 seconds of no device actively able to handle traffic. Raising this higher increases this window, but also helps mitigate the risk of split-brain due to transient network issues. - Rajaraman_12066Jan 08, 2016NimbostratusHi, Thanks for the response. It helps.
- Mr__Katic_15215Jun 03, 2016AltocumulusJust one additional comment. You cannot use dedicated fail-over port builtin in BIG IP hardware. So if you want to have HA redundancy on HA Pair link used for heartbeat you will need to dedicate another fiber for that.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com