F5 is upgrading its customer support chat feature on My.F5.com. Chat support will be unavailable from 6am-10am PST on 1/20/26. Refer to K000159584 for details.

Forum Discussion

kargyrides_1348's avatar
kargyrides_1348
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Oct 08, 2013

BIG-IP 6900 High Available Cluster Configuration

Hi, We have 2 (two) F5 BIG-IP 6900 APM/LTM gateways with the names: F5-GW1 and F5-GW2. F5-GW1 is used as a load-balancer for Web Server Farm 1 and F5-GW2 is used as a load balancer for Web Server Fa...
availability
design
security
Sec-Enabled_658's avatar
Sec-Enabled_658
Icon for Cirrostratus rankCirrostratus
Oct 08, 2013

Are the 6900's currently in a device group or are they running standalone? Sounds like they are standalone right now. What version of software are you running? Using different traffic groups might be a solution for this. As far as I know, the HA cluster can be setup for traffic groups, but not on a module basis. ASM policies are tied to vips, so you might be able to have web svr farm 1 vips on traffic group A which could be active on F5-GW1, while then having web svr farm 2 vips on traffic group B which could be active on F5-GW2. The traffic groups could be failed over seperate from each other. Of course you would want to make sure that either 6900 could handle traffic for both groups at any given time in-case one of the units dies.

 

  • kargyrides_1348's avatar
    kargyrides_1348
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    Oct 08, 2013
    Hi Nathan, Thanks for your reply. I am not 100% sure about the current configuration but I believe the 6900s are running as standalone. Both 6900s are running BIG-IP 11.3.0 Build 3131.0 Hotfix HF6. Based on your answer, if Web Server Farm A VIP and Web Server Farm B VIP is already configured on each of the existing 6900 gateway (used for load balancing), is it still possible to configure the HA Cluster scenario ONLY for the ASM policies ?