Unable to ping from some self ip on Velos
Hello team, I have configured a tenant on my Velos, everything works fine but, recently I have verified that when I try to ping to my default gw with the interface asociate to a self ip yellow-fe ping is ok but, wher i try to do it by using another interface associate to a different self ip such as Mam_Fe ping does not works as expected. I have attached the evidence. I have reconfigured the vlan on my blade with no success; i've veified everything on my F5 but it seems that the configuration is ok. Somebody could help me for fixing this problem ? Many thanks in advance for your time . Awaiting your news.Implementing multi-link bandwidth usage threshold redundancy for outbound traffic
I have multiple link exports, using irules for outbound traffic. For example, there are currently China Telecom and China Unicom. Can I define the bandwidth usage of each link as 80% according to the policy or specify a threshold to implement a switching mechanism? It cannot be set globally, only for member or outbound VS, or are there any permissions that can achieve it? When the bandwidth usage of any member exceeds the custom value, traffic will no longer be allocated to the member, and the existing traffic sessions will remain unchanged and wait for aging. Thank you very much for discussing with each other!How to realize multi-link bandwidth utilization load
I have multiple links, namely China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom. Currently, I use the traditional outbound virtual server to go out through irules. According to the internal client request target address, the corresponding link is selected for the specific ISP to share. I have a requirement. Can it be realized according to a certain pool or member (specifically referring to the sharing limit threshold of a certain ISP link bandwidth utilization rate, such as China Telecom 100Mbps. When the threshold is exceeded, the new session traffic will no longer share the telecom member or according to the percentage utilization rate)? The current version is 17. I have tried to use Acceleration ›› Bandwidth Controllers : Policies and then call the location Network ›› Packet Filters : Rules ›› New Packet Filter Rule. But this is global and has a certain impact on other parts. It requires limited policy adjustment. Is there a better way, including whether the irules method can use the BWC::measure measurement method to achieve it? If you can write it, please leave a message! Thank you! Any message is very grateful! ! !
Syn-Flood protection in F5 LTM BIG-IP 17.1.1.3
HI Guys Sorry maybe i have not been so clear. I've ben searching for information about syn-flood protection of f5 LTM. I know there is the this feature (i saw the command on the CLI "syn-flood protection not active) but i could not find many information. I searched in the : techdocs.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/bigip-system-syn-flood-attacks-13-0-0/1.html page but it seems all these pages of f5.com are no longer there. Can anyone explain how to activate this feature or send some exhaustive link ? device is BIG-IP 17.1.1.3 Build 0.0.5 Point Release 3 Thank You B.R Mario
