Forum Discussion
Altocumulusirule
Hi Bhupendra ,
in Step 2 of rewrite >>> do you need the source ip matches as well or Not ?
So you need to match on specific source IP address/address first and then match /A or /B then move traffic to pool A but if the same match on source ip address/addresses but with uri starts with /c-new modify it to be /C and forward traffic to pool A
if non of those forward to pool B
that's Correct ?Maybe think about using a local traffic policy rather than an iRule. It will be more efficient and easier for you to manage
Hi Bhupendra ,
As PeteWhite recommended , yes it's eaiser than iRule and will give you the same result.
it should be like this :>>> Note that , the last condition "3rd match " should be All Traffic and then do those Actions ( Log and Forward to default pool )
This is an overview about Local Traffic policy :
https://techdocs.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/local-traffic-policies-getting-started-12-1-0/1.html
Goodluck
Altocumulus
in Step 2 of rewrite >>> do you need the source ip matches as well or Not ? ------- >>>>No we don't want to match source IP here only URI with any source.
So you need to match on specific source IP address/address first and then match /A or /B then move traffic to pool A but if the same match on source ip address/addresses but with uri starts with /c-new modify it to be /C and forward traffic to pool A
if non of those forward to pool B
that's Correct ? ----------------->>First condition match on specific source IP address/address first then match URI /A or /B for selected source IPs then move traffic to pool A
Second condition -any source with uri starts with /c-new modify it to be /C and forward traffic to pool A
If no condition match from 1&2 then default traffic should be route POOL B
Hi Bhupendra ,
Have you tested the irule as well ?
just test it , you may take it as a reference in further implementations.
Also it will add to me that my code was correct or need further modifications.
