Technical Forum
Ask questions. Discover Answers.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Custom Alert Banner

BIG-IP to Cisco via 10Gb SFP+ Direct Attach Copper

Divice_138546
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

Hi,

 

Anybody using Cisco DAC 10G transceiver/copper cables (TwinAx) to connect from a Cisco switch to a BIG-IP?

 

Can't seem to find an answer, suspect it is not supported which is always an issue for DACs between vendors.

 

Cheers

 

14 REPLIES 14

Divice_138546
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus
- Two questions I guess, does it work? is it supported?

Brad_Parker
Cirrus
Cirrus
F5 will only support their transceivers, so its probably not supported. No experience whether it will work or not. You could always try and see, but I know that is an expensive gamble if it doesn't work.

shaggy
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

F5's official stance on 3rd party hardware components:

 

https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/8000/100/sol8153.html

 

Divice_138546
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

Thanks for the replies. When I search for the 10G direct attach copper cables I find this link:-

 

https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/f5-plat-accessories/2.html

 

This makes no sense, a 10G DAC with 1000Base-T Copper Ethernet Transceiver Module and RJ45 connector?

 

F5-UPG-SFPC+-3M seems to be the product I'm looking for, although the Cisco will no doubt complain if I use that.

 

Inter-vendor DAC support is a shambles!

 

Used Cisco DAC, unsupported but works a treat.

Divice_138546
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus
Indeed, it would be good to know if someone has tried it to save buying additional DACs, although Cisco DACs would always come in useful...

bojan_sukalo_20
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

We use it also from NEXUS 7700 to F5 and works like a charm. We use passive ones, 5m in length.

 

Ichnafi_177360
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

Let me hop on this rather old toppic and add a question:

 

The product catalog entry of the F5 DAC-cable says: "for connecting the SFP+ ports on your F5 platform to the SFP+ modules on an upstream switch."

 

Since F5 has no own switches...which switch do they refer to? I mean, does F5 think they are the only company with "own brand only support" restriction?

 

Let's bring it down to numbers: I want to connect my LTM pair to my Nexus pair. So i can choose to spend $8000 on SFP+ (4 of each vendor) or $200 on 4 DAC cables to achieve the same goal.

 

Proportionality anyone?

 

Ichnafi
Cirrostratus
Cirrostratus

Let me hop on this rather old toppic and add a question:

 

The product catalog entry of the F5 DAC-cable says: "for connecting the SFP+ ports on your F5 platform to the SFP+ modules on an upstream switch."

 

Since F5 has no own switches...which switch do they refer to? I mean, does F5 think they are the only company with "own brand only support" restriction?

 

Let's bring it down to numbers: I want to connect my LTM pair to my Nexus pair. So i can choose to spend $8000 on SFP+ (4 of each vendor) or $200 on 4 DAC cables to achieve the same goal.

 

Proportionality anyone?

 

EdDial
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

I've been using Cisco DACs for years with the smaller F5s (2000,4000 series) however I've noticed that although they work with my i7800, I did get a notification when I initially powered up that it was an "unsupported optic".

 

We are seeing the same issue. The Cisco DACs work fine with the 2400 series, and we are seeing "unsupported optic"on our 5250

 

EdDial_116074
Nimbostratus
Nimbostratus

I've been using Cisco DACs for years with the smaller F5s (2000,4000 series) however I've noticed that although they work with my i7800, I did get a notification when I initially powered up that it was an "unsupported optic".

 

We are seeing the same issue. The Cisco DACs work fine with the 2400 series, and we are seeing "unsupported optic"on our 5250

 

Stefan_Klotz
Cumulonimbus
Cumulonimbus

Although this topic is already some years old, I hope someone can provide me the latest status for this issue.
We are currently also facing this issue with a i2600. Tmsh list net interface displayes "Unsupported Optic detected" and interface status for 5.0 and 6.0 is DOWN.
If I check all above comments it seems it's working for some of you and for others not.
I also tried to verify if there is any possibility to disable the vendor-check, but I can't find anything useful.
And more useful information would be very helpful!
Thank you!

Regards Stefan 🙂