05-Feb-2015 07:09
Hi,
Anybody using Cisco DAC 10G transceiver/copper cables (TwinAx) to connect from a Cisco switch to a BIG-IP?
Can't seem to find an answer, suspect it is not supported which is always an issue for DACs between vendors.
Cheers
05-Feb-2015 07:10
05-Feb-2015 11:34
05-Feb-2015 11:36
F5's official stance on 3rd party hardware components:
https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/8000/100/sol8153.html
17-Feb-2015 06:15
Thanks for the replies. When I search for the 10G direct attach copper cables I find this link:-
https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/f5-plat-accessories/2.html
This makes no sense, a 10G DAC with 1000Base-T Copper Ethernet Transceiver Module and RJ45 connector?
F5-UPG-SFPC+-3M seems to be the product I'm looking for, although the Cisco will no doubt complain if I use that.
Inter-vendor DAC support is a shambles!
06-Jul-2015 07:30
17-Feb-2015 06:21
06-Jul-2015 08:11
We use it also from NEXUS 7700 to F5 and works like a charm. We use passive ones, 5m in length.
15-Sep-2016 23:41
Let me hop on this rather old toppic and add a question:
The product catalog entry of the F5 DAC-cable says: "for connecting the SFP+ ports on your F5 platform to the SFP+ modules on an upstream switch."
Since F5 has no own switches...which switch do they refer to? I mean, does F5 think they are the only company with "own brand only support" restriction?
Let's bring it down to numbers: I want to connect my LTM pair to my Nexus pair. So i can choose to spend $8000 on SFP+ (4 of each vendor) or $200 on 4 DAC cables to achieve the same goal.
Proportionality anyone?
15-Sep-2016 23:41
Let me hop on this rather old toppic and add a question:
The product catalog entry of the F5 DAC-cable says: "for connecting the SFP+ ports on your F5 platform to the SFP+ modules on an upstream switch."
Since F5 has no own switches...which switch do they refer to? I mean, does F5 think they are the only company with "own brand only support" restriction?
Let's bring it down to numbers: I want to connect my LTM pair to my Nexus pair. So i can choose to spend $8000 on SFP+ (4 of each vendor) or $200 on 4 DAC cables to achieve the same goal.
Proportionality anyone?
07-Sep-2017 06:14
I've been using Cisco DACs for years with the smaller F5s (2000,4000 series) however I've noticed that although they work with my i7800, I did get a notification when I initially powered up that it was an "unsupported optic".
11-Jan-2018 07:50
We are seeing the same issue. The Cisco DACs work fine with the 2400 series, and we are seeing "unsupported optic"on our 5250
07-Sep-2017 06:14
I've been using Cisco DACs for years with the smaller F5s (2000,4000 series) however I've noticed that although they work with my i7800, I did get a notification when I initially powered up that it was an "unsupported optic".
11-Jan-2018 07:50
We are seeing the same issue. The Cisco DACs work fine with the 2400 series, and we are seeing "unsupported optic"on our 5250
27-Oct-2023 05:12
Although this topic is already some years old, I hope someone can provide me the latest status for this issue.
We are currently also facing this issue with a i2600. Tmsh list net interface displayes "Unsupported Optic detected" and interface status for 5.0 and 6.0 is DOWN.
If I check all above comments it seems it's working for some of you and for others not.
I also tried to verify if there is any possibility to disable the vendor-check, but I can't find anything useful.
And more useful information would be very helpful!
Thank you!
Regards Stefan 🙂