Forum Discussion
VIP under VIP configuration using nexthop
I have two pairs of LTMs. On pair one I have a VIP configured with a pool member that is a VIP on pair 2. I want to use nexthop to specify the vlan that pair one uses to get to pair 2 and for some reason it is not working...
LTM 1 ltm virtual ssiqa-9999 { destination 192.168.200.209:http ip-protocol tcp mask 255.255.255.255 pool ssiqa-9999 profiles { http { } tcp { } } rules { ssotestrule } snatpool ssotest }
ltm pool ssiqa-9999 { members { 10.66.2.123:http { session monitor-enabled } } monitor tcp }
ltm snatpool ssotest { members { 192.168.200.202 } }
modify rule ssotestrule { when LB_SELECTED { if { [ matchclass [LB::server addr] equals ssotestrule ] } { nexthop 192.168.200.193 } } }
LTM 2
ltm virtual ssotest-80 { destination 10.66.2.123:http ip-protocol tcp mask 255.255.255.255 profiles { http { } tcp { } } rules { ssotest } }
ltm rule ssotest { when HTTP_REQUEST { HTTP::respond 200 content "
Success!" "Content-Type" "text/html" } }
- Charles_LambNimbostratus
Sorry... when I say it is not working it is leaving the default route on the F5 rather than using 192.168.200.193
- What_Lies_Bene1Cirrostratus
You appear to have the nexthop command commented out? Is that just the DC formatting or actually the case? Could you post just the iRule using the 'preformatted' option (forth button from left) so I can understand that better. Is ssotestrule a data group?
- Charles_LambNimbostratus
ltm rule ssotestrule { when LB_SELECTED { if { [ matchclass [LB::server addr] equals ssotestrule ] } { nexthop 192.168.200.193 } } }
- What_Lies_Bene1CirrostratusThanks. Looks commented out!
- Charles_LambNimbostratus
It was...forgot to take out the comment before I copied it over. I was trouble shooting multiple things and commented it out for something...cannot remember what exactly but that was not the problem. With it not commented out it still defaults to the default route of the F5.
- What_Lies_Bene1Cirrostratus
OK, so, let's add some logging and see if it matches the keys in your data group. Also, how are you testing/confirming things? Is the nexthop subnet directly connected to the F5? Have you tried specifying the VLAN with the nexthop command?
ltm rule ssotestrule { when LB_SELECTED { if { [ matchclass [LB::server addr] equals ssotestrule ] } { log local0. "Destination Pool Member Is: [LB::server addr]" nexthop 192.168.200.193 } } }
- Charles_LambNimbostratus
I did use logging to validate that the matchclass argument is working. The subnet for the next hop is directly connected to the F5. The problem we are trying to solve is that without specifying the next hop traffic comes in on one vlan and leaves on another. I am using tcp dumps to validate the vlans. I have also specified the vlan in the next hop command and it did not change the outcome. It seems like under the WHEN LB_SELECTED event nexthop is just ignored... It appears to be doing something under CLIENT_ACCEPTED and HTTP_REQUEST but it breaks my test all together... I am still trying to figure out why that is.
- What_Lies_Bene1Cirrostratus
Any other iRules applied to the VS?
- Charles_LambNimbostratus
Nope...
- What_Lies_Bene1Cirrostratus
I'm plucking at straws now. Is there an ARP entry for that nexthop address?
- JRahmAdmin
i'm confused as to why you need to specify the vlan at all.
- Is 10.66.2/ locally defined on LTM1?
- where does the nexthop IP live? LTM1 or an upstream router?
- why if you are only defining one destination for the traffic (LTM2 vip) are you checking to see what the selected address is, you specified only one in the pool.
A little more detail would be helpful.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com