Forum Discussion
v11 upgrade without downtime for active/standby pair?
Were running active/standby pairs of v10.2.3 that are connected with the fail-over serial cable.
I've upgraded a couple BIGIP's to v11 using the guide F5 provides:
http://support.f5.com/content/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/bigip_upgrading_activestandby_systems_11_0_0/_jcr_content/pdfAttach/download/file.res/bigip_system_upgrading_guide_v11_0.pdf
The guide describes a procedure which involves shutting down interfaces on the BIGIP devices, and at one point both the active and passive unit have all their interfaces shut down, which of course means that there is an interruption to the service.
The problem is that I need to upgrade environments where downtime is hard to schedule.
Does anyone know of a way to avoid downtime for the pair?
Thanks in advance,
ka
- nitassEmployeei do not think mirroring works between v10 and v11. so, it will have service interruption anyway.
- HamishCirrocumulusAlthough if all your profiles have loose-initiation (Or there's no active connections) and there's no passive style persistence, then you should be able to get away with it... But it's a big if because anything relying on source IP for persistence for example won't have the persistence state.
- hooleylistCirrostratusFor a major version upgrade, I would prepare my users for possible downtime. You might be able to do it without affecting users, but I wouldn't assume it.
- Craig_12932NimbostratusDue the introduction of
ScaleN in v11 the HA configuration has completely changed from a sync peer to a sync group, for this reason the mirroring will break and you may also be required to make some modifications to the HA configuration.Even if it is just mirroring that is broken they you need to bear in mind how the back end application will handle the re-connections, i have a client with (peak) 20K concurrent Exchange users, if connection mirroring failed upon failover then you would have 20K clients initiating a connection to the backend Exchange servers, I'm not sure that many applications/infrastructures can handle this.
Play safe and arrange an hours downtime and test the upgrade before attending site on a strongbox with there config on always best to be prepared for any likelihood!
- aziz_26955Nimbostratus@KA, i hade the same issue for 4 Month ago,
- Josh_41258NimbostratusI am attempting to upgrade a 10.2 active/standby pair to 11.1 HF2. I am following the guide referenced in this URL.
- danteampdc_1740NimbostratusWe actually just did an upgrade recently and ran into the same problem when upgrading to 11.6. We followed the directions to upgrade an active/standby but when rebooting into 11.6 we also got the ONLINE (STANDBY) and we could not get the 11.6 device to handle traffic. The solution was actually as simple as going to the ACTIVE node (the one not upgraded yet) and force it to standby. Even though both devices reported they were in standalone mode this actually did work. Once we toggled the standby unit to active we were able to update the 2nd unit and the rest of the upgrade went fairly well.
- ib_37889NimbostratusJosh
- dariusjs_19885NimbostratusJust as the guys say I would prepare for downtime as well. V11.0 had some nasty GUI bugs (I was using configuration utility not tmsh) to recreate the device groups.
I don't know if its been fixed in v11.1 and onwwards but I gather youre better off to do a lot of this from tmsh if possible.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com