Forum Discussion
NimbostratusUneven Traffic Distribution in the Pool. 2 members are receiving very less traffic
Uneven Traffic Distribution in the Pool. 2 members are receiving very less traffic.
VS is Performance L4 with default fastL4 profile
LB Method is Least Connections (Member)
LTM running v12.1.2
Any suggestions on how to resolve this or possible causes will be very helpful. Thank You.
Vijay_ECirrus
Did the pool members fail at any point - can you check logs ?
Are you using any persistence ?
May be the clients are coming from behind a proxy ?
- mfkk531_168091
The logs are clean, the pool members did not fail at anytime.
We are using source address persistence but the clients are high number of differing IP addresses so this shouldnt have caused issue. The same setup in alternate DC is working just fine.
The client are NOT behind proxy. In fact the pool members are the proxy servers in this case.
I opened a case with F5 support and they stated this is caused by a glitch in Source Address Persistence going along with Least COnnections method. It happens rarely but no pattern or specific cause provided.
Solution provided by F5 - Do a failover to standby unit - this will close all connections on current device and re-establish new connections on the other device - that will clear up the distribution issue.
Result- It worked as they stated. Now we see evenly balanced traffic accross all 6 pool members after the failover.Thanks for the replies and assistance!
Ed_SummersThat's very interesting - have not seen that before. Thanks for providing the work-around.
Curious if the fail-over is required, or if the same result can be achieved by deleting all connections and persistence records for that VS?
- mfkk531_168091
Yes, that was the first recommendation from F5 support, but closing all connections on the VS would result in an outage. So failover was the best option.
- mfkk531_168091
***Yes, that was the first recommendation from F5 support, but closing all connections on the VS (and waiting the 180s persistence to timeout) would result in an outage. So failover was the best option.