Forum Discussion
SNAT problem, caused by oneconnect?
Is there a known problem with oneconnect and SNAT iRules?
I have to set a special SNAT adress for requests from some special users.
The iRule looks like this:
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {
switch [IP::client_addr] {
??.??.??.??/?? {
snatpool SNAT_PENTESTER
}
default {
Default usage of SNAT Automap
snat automap
}
}
}
This works sometimes, sometimes not. We didn't found a reason, why the LTM sometimes uses the SNAT iRule and sometimes not. The VS uses a oneconnect profile. Could this be a reason for this confusing reaction?
Any help welcome!
22 Replies
- Matthias_Ubben_
Nimbostratus
Thanks a lot to all, especially mimlo and nitass!
I'll ask my service provider and the service provider will ask the F5 support ...
If F5 confirms this expectation, I'll inform you soon.
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com