Forum Discussion
Norman_Elton_13
Nimbostratus
NimbostratusSNAT pool member seems to be ignored
I've got an IP Forwarding virtual server. With SNAT enabled, and a pool specified, it works fine. When I disable SNAT on the virtual server and use "snatpool" on an iRule, it also works fine. But whe...
bboyjnr_8532
Cirrus
CirrusHi Norman,
Wiki says its valid...
https://devcentral.f5.com/wiki/iRules.snatpool.ashx
can we have a look at the rule?
thanks,
bb
Norman_Elton_13Nimbostratus
NimbostratusThe rule is pretty simple:
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {
snatpool WM-SNAT member 192.168.2.22
}
It continues to function as if I hadn't specified a member. I'm suspecting it may just be a bug.
If I specify an IP address with "snat [IP]", it seems that IP must already be configured in a SNAT pool, or else the F5 won't respond to ARPs. So that issue is explainable.
Thanks
Norman
