Forum Discussion
R2600: how to deal with vlans in tenant's partition's
Hey all,
I'm in the process of replacing an old 4200 with a new R-series 2600 for a customer.
The current config in the 4200 consists of several partitions, and in the to be deployed tenant we want to keep using partitions.
When deploying a tenant in the R2600, I can select which vlans I want to "pass on" towards the tenant.
They will then automatically show up in the /Common of the tenant. So far it all works nice.
However, I need some of these vlans to end up in a specific partition.
So how do I go about that?
I can manually create these vlans under the desired partition, but I don't think it's possible if they already exist in /Common.
So, catch-22?
I won't return to clients site for a while, and currently don't have acces to a home lab or something of the like.
So I was hoping to get some clarity on this, to better prepare myself.
regards,
8 Replies
Better test the vCMP way deleting them from Common and creating them under the desired partition. If you see issues contact support, so first test. Other than that better run the latest F5OS version.
Moving an inherited VLAN to an alternate partition in a vCMP guest (f5.com)
- Radboud_Veld
Altostratus
Thanks for your answer.
I have occasionally administered vCMP's but not with partitions on the guest.
Anyway, shouldn't these vlans (under partitions in the tenants) also "exist" on the appliance when deploying a tenant?
How else will they connect to the outside world.
I'm probably missing something here... I'll give your advice a go when I'm back on-site.Yes you have to create and assign them to the tenant from the appliance, this is why you will see them in Partition Common when you access the tenant as they will be autopopulated.
- Radboud_Veld
Altostratus
thanks for the patience, I'll post an update when I get it working
- Radboud_Veld
Altostratus
Thanks all, I forgot about the existince of Route-domains in order to keep the traffic separated. Works like a charm now...
Still having some issues with loading my Journey-modified UCS file, but I'll try and start a case for that with F5 - Stefan_Klotz
Cumulonimbus
We need to setup different VLANs in dedicated partitions/Route Domains (right now on r5600, but later also on r2600).
Therefor we created first the VLANs on F5OS and assigned them to the tenant.
Then these VLANs will correctly shown within the tenant, but by default in the Common partition.
Now we deleted the VLAN in Common, switched to the required partition and tried to recreate it there as well using the exact same name like in F5OS.
But then we get the ERROR: Unable to find interface object for configured trunk member 3.0
For your reference, we have two LAGs created in F5OS, one for heartbeat with interfaces 4.0 & 8.0 and another for user traffic with interfaces 3.0 & 7.0.
When creating the VLAN within the tenant we select the appropriate trunk-interface from the interface list.
As already mentioned in another post it might be related that the interfaces are not correctly shown within the tenand. At least nobody could answer if this is a "normal" behavior.
Within the trunk details the correct physical interfaces from F5OS will be displayed:But on the Interface list they are missing:
That's why also the error message makes (theoretically) sense:
ERROR: Unable to find interface object for configured trunk member 3.0
Where is this coming from and how can this be fixed?
Thank you!
Regards,
Stefan :)
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
