For more information regarding the security incident at F5, the actions we are taking to address it, and our ongoing efforts to protect our customers, click here.

Forum Discussion

Ashish_Ram_Tak1's avatar
Ashish_Ram_Tak1
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Apr 25, 2014

queries regarding route domain and partitions,

Hello Friends,

 

I have below questions regarding the route domain and partitions concepts.

 

1) Can we use the same RD in a multipal partitions. 2) We have created the single partition with two RD's in between some these some application needs to communicate with other RD but some doesn't need any communication, if suppose we have enabled the communication between two RD's then will it affect the applications which doesn't require any communication with other RD's application 3) Can we use the same VLAN in multipal Partitions. 4) Can we use the same VLAN in multipal RD's

 

Thanks in advance for your kind support.

 

Regards. Ashish.

 

7 Replies

  • Hey Ashish,

     

    1) No, an RD can only exist in one AP

     

    2) Not sure I understand the question but perhaps strict isolation might help here?

     

    3) No, a VLAN can only exist in one AP

     

    4) No, a VLAN can only exist in one RD

     

  • i think partition is more on how configuration is seen...

    e.g.

    [root@ve11a:Active:In Sync] config  tmsh -c "cd /p_one;list net self;cd /p_two;list net self"
    net self 1.2.3.4%1/24 {
        address 1.2.3.4%1/24
        partition p_one
        traffic-group /Common/traffic-group-local-only
        vlan /Common/v_one
    }
    net self 5.6.7.8%1/24 {
        address 5.6.7.8%1/24
        partition p_two
        traffic-group /Common/traffic-group-local-only
        vlan /Common/v_one
    }
    
    • Ashish_Ram_Tak1's avatar
      Ashish_Ram_Tak1
      Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
      Hello Nit, I am not able to understand what you are trying to say :( plus the ip range we are using is same for the VLAN
  • i think partition is more on how configuration is seen...

    e.g.

    [root@ve11a:Active:In Sync] config  tmsh -c "cd /p_one;list net self;cd /p_two;list net self"
    net self 1.2.3.4%1/24 {
        address 1.2.3.4%1/24
        partition p_one
        traffic-group /Common/traffic-group-local-only
        vlan /Common/v_one
    }
    net self 5.6.7.8%1/24 {
        address 5.6.7.8%1/24
        partition p_two
        traffic-group /Common/traffic-group-local-only
        vlan /Common/v_one
    }
    
    • Ashish_Ram_Tak1's avatar
      Ashish_Ram_Tak1
      Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
      Hello Nit, I am not able to understand what you are trying to say :( plus the ip range we are using is same for the VLAN
  • I am not able to understand what you are trying to say :(

     

    i feel administrative partition and route domain are different things. partition is like view of configuration but route domain is to have multiple routing table.

     

  • Ultimately, if the configuration on each device needs to be different then you clearly can't synchronise it. It seems obvious to me, am I wrong?