Forum Discussion
priority groups and priority group activation
- Apr 05, 2017
Hi Nate,
Looking at your requirements, failing from PG10 to PG5 is completely achievable using PGA.
Your latter requirement isn't possible using standard configuration.
The only achievable way you could do that with 1 Pool, was if your application/server was capable of listening on multiple ports, and you could have PG10 with your preferred members, and then cascade down through orders of preference combinations based on other PG statements.... But this would get messy ! It hurts my head even thinking about it!
Another way would be to use a fallback pool on the Virtual Server, and if PGA members for PG10 and 5 are down. Use the fallback pool...
Hi Nate,
Looking at your requirements, failing from PG10 to PG5 is completely achievable using PGA.
Your latter requirement isn't possible using standard configuration.
The only achievable way you could do that with 1 Pool, was if your application/server was capable of listening on multiple ports, and you could have PG10 with your preferred members, and then cascade down through orders of preference combinations based on other PG statements.... But this would get messy ! It hurts my head even thinking about it!
Another way would be to use a fallback pool on the Virtual Server, and if PGA members for PG10 and 5 are down. Use the fallback pool...
- Nate83_280180Apr 10, 2017Nimbostratus
HI Iain,
Yeah, that's what I figured. Currently testing PGA with destination address persistence, which could potentially give most of the requirement. Will let you know how it turns out.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com