Forum Discussion
Pool in partition /Common - pool members in partition /MyPartition
Hi all.
I have a question regarding the following problem: Pool in partition /Common - pool members in partition /MyPartition. Is this possible? I have been browsing DevCentral, but could not find any satisfying answer. For what I know, normally, when I create BIG-IP objects, a referenced object must reside either in the same partition as the object that is referencing it, or in partition Common. So the case I am describing here, should be incorrect, i.e. Pool in Pool in partition /Common cannot have pool members in partition /MyPartition. Could you help?
- Ryan77777
Altocumulus
In my experience, you can have /Common resources in /MyPartition resources, but not vice-versa. For example, if I have a Pool in /MyPartition, I can have pool members from /Common. I cannot have a pool in /Common and use pool members from /MyPartition.
I don't know that for 100% certain... but in my experience, that has been the case.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com