For more information regarding the security incident at F5, the actions we are taking to address it, and our ongoing efforts to protect our customers, click here.

Forum Discussion

rsbs01's avatar
rsbs01
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Jan 28, 2019

Pool in partition /Common - pool members in partition /MyPartition

Hi all.

 

I have a question regarding the following problem: Pool in partition /Common - pool members in partition /MyPartition. Is this possible? I have been browsing DevCentral, but could not find any satisfying answer. For what I know, normally, when I create BIG-IP objects, a referenced object must reside either in the same partition as the object that is referencing it, or in partition Common. So the case I am describing here, should be incorrect, i.e. Pool in Pool in partition /Common cannot have pool members in partition /MyPartition. Could you help?

 

1 Reply

  • In my experience, you can have /Common resources in /MyPartition resources, but not vice-versa. For example, if I have a Pool in /MyPartition, I can have pool members from /Common. I cannot have a pool in /Common and use pool members from /MyPartition.

     

    I don't know that for 100% certain... but in my experience, that has been the case.