Forum Discussion
CirrusNative SNI support for Health Monitoring
CirrusThanks to you all for sharing your thoughts! Much appreciated!
Since we have some space left on our vcmp host i will spin up another guest in order to do some testing with this.
Again, wondering why something so mainstream as SNI is not natively supported in HM-land. Or in the case of in-TMM: not being fully documented yet. Perhaps someone from F5 could pls comment on this.
Erik
- Lidev
Nacreous
ErikM wrote:
Or in the case of in-TMM: not being fully documented yet. Perhaps someone from F5 could pls comment on this.
I also wondered about this, I had to open a case at the time to find out that I needed to change the in-TMM-in variable for my purpose as nothing was documented.
JRahm : Any ideas ? 🔍 
thecarrionkindAltostratus
I've started to use in-TMM monitoring to SNI in non-production and noticed this:
- less verbosity in logs when enabling health check monitor logs on a member of a pool.
- before you have a message when you have response that doesn't match the receive string defined in a http health check, now it's only up or down.
- an specific application health check goes UP when using bigd monitoring. Goes DOWN when switching to In-TMM monitoring.
So I'm not so happy about less verbosity with In-TMM monitoring.
