Forum Discussion
BPetronio_11363
Nimbostratus
Apr 06, 2010Lack of IP, iRule decicion by URL matching
Hello,
I've no experience in this, but i think it could be easily done.
I will have a LC scenario, where in one ISP i will 1 ip address for each content, and in the second ISP, the client is not achieving that goal.
My client is asking if for one ISP, I could configure the same IP for different contents.
Imagine, that for one ISP I have:
www.cst1.pt with VS 1.1.1.1 (80) – Pool Member (192.168.1.1:80)
www.cst2.pt with VS 1.1.1.2 (80) – Pool Member (192.168.1.2:80)
As the client has not 2 ip public address for both content on ISP2, can i do the following ?:
www.cst1.pt with VS 2.2.2.1 (80) – ( Redirecting client for a different IP Port (2.2.2.1:100) (new VS) based on URL ) - Pool Member (192.168.1.1:80)
www.cst2.pt with VS 2.2.2.1 (80) – ( Redirecting client for a different IP Port (2.2.2.1:200) (new VS) based on URL ) - Pool Member (192.168.1.2:80)
Here, we are falling in 2 questions:
- 1st, the Link Controller, given back the IP address for a certain name resolution.
- 2nd, the VS with some kind of iRule, matching a given URL for making decision on each PoolMember or different VS (if redirecting) it will hit.
The client is making this question, not only for 1 or 2 contents, but for almost 40 content.
Is it possible?
Can someone more experience give me some lights on iRule, if it possible of it ?
Best Regards,
Bruno Petrónio
- hoolio
Cirrostratus
Hi Bruno, - BPetronio_11363
Nimbostratus
Thank you Aaron,
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects