Forum Discussion
Hash CARP: uri or path
Hi,
Question
1:
Our customers use
a virtual server (VS) of web proxy. This virtual server is associated to a pool
with four proxies. CARP is configured on the VS profile. I´ve just configured
CARP using hash for URI, but it appears the following error: when
customers access web form pages, the form page process doesn´t work properly,
and can´t be completed
( However, If CARP is
disabled and activating source address persistence, it works !!!!.).
I
configured the irule containing the string "persist hash [HTTP::uri".
I really wonder if changing hashing to "persist hash [HTTP::path"
would be more suitable than hashing by URI…..What´s your opinion? I
strongly appreciate it…
J
.
Question
2:
I have other
doubt…. Excuse me but, what´s the difference between "persist hash
[HTTP::path" and "persist hash [HTTP::host"? Which hashing
mechanism of them do you consider would be better for our deployment?.
Regards.
Antonio.
1 Reply
- hoolio
Cirrostratus
Hi Antonio,
You could use [HTTP::path] or maybe it would be more ideal to parse the domain of the host instead so that all requests for example.com go to the same proxy. You could also handle IP addresses in the host header and requests without a host header value:Check if Host header is present and not an IP address if {[string match -nocase {*[a-z]*} [HTTP::host]]}{ Persist on the last two fields of the domain https://devcentral.f5.com/wiki/iRules.domain.ashx persist hash [domain [HTTP::host] 2] } elseif {[HTTP::host] ne ""}{ Host header value is an IP persist hash [HTTP::host] } else { Host header value is blank so persist on the path persist hash [HTTP::path] }
Aaron
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com