Forum Discussion
CirrusForward traffic to pool member with same port as VS - VIP is on port 0
Hi,
Need help in setting up an application.
VIP is on port 0 as the application can work on 30 ports.
Now i want to forward the traffic to the pool member on the same port as it arrives on the virtual server.
eg: abc.com:4448 -> VIP is on port 0 so it will take it
Now it should go to the pool memebrs on port 4448 as well, and so on for any other request coming in to the VS
7 Replies
- Kai_Wilke
MVP
Hi Aditya,
define your Virtual Server as well as your Pool Members with the
port setting (Port 0 in WebUI).:anyThis will make sure your VS accepts traffic on every port and forwards the traffic to your pool members on the same port.
Cheers, Kai
Stanislas_Piro2Cumulonimbus
You can define the virtual server with port translation disabled... the virtual server won’t change the port
LeonS_296027Nimbostratus
Where is you certificates located?
Aditya_MehraHi Leon,
They are on the servers.
AceDawg1Have you tried running a capture (tcpdump and ssldump) to determine where SSL communications are breaking down? If you're not familiar with ssldump, check out:
.https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K10209- Aditya_Mehra
Hey, Did not take a tcp and ssl dump, but I added the below iRule and it works for http port.
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED { if {([TCP::local_port] != 80) && ([TCP::local_port] != 8103)} { HTTP::disable } }
But this does not work for https, the request passes through to the backend pool member succesfully but the X-Forwarded IP is not present. I believe as we disable the http profile then the X-Forwarded_http profile is not used at all.
Any workaround for this?
