F5 is upgrading its customer support chat feature on My.F5.com. Chat support will be unavailable from 6am-10am PST on 1/20/26. Refer to K000159584 for details.

Forum Discussion

Prakash_Krishna's avatar
Prakash_Krishna
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Apr 15, 2016

Destination mask for Virtual Server accepts only "255.255.255.255"

Dear Experts,   While creating Virtual Server, without giving the Destination Address mask, internally the value for mask has been considered as 255.255.255.255. Even if we don't give the same val...
cloud
iControl
Prakash_Krishna's avatar
Prakash_Krishna
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Apr 15, 2016

 

Thanks for your quick response. In LTM 12.0 version, we do not have the host/network option. whereas if I give the value as 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.255, it goes well and Virtual server is getting created. Even if we don't give the mask value, giving only the IP Address alone also getting created but in the back end value 255.255.255.255 is getting added to the subnet mask. Validated the same using iControl APIs also Without this value, not able to create the Virtual server using iControl (SOAP) API as well.

 

  • Domai's avatar
    Domai
    Icon for Altostratus rankAltostratus
    Apr 15, 2016
    Ahh this is 12 version. I see That is correct when using tmsh I usually give the mask like this - "create virtual test_vs destination 192.168.0.1:80 mask 255.255.255.255"