Forum Discussion
BIG-IP DNS and LTM on 1 node
- Feb 09, 2018
I spoke to a friend I have working at F5 and these are his thoughts:
There are serval options for my deployment type and no set best practice design. It is about scalability, growth and what I am most comfortable with.
The GLB is typically deployed either on a separate piece of hardware to the LTM devices, or run within a separate vCMS (virtual instance) on the same tin and not within a separate partition (https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/vcmp-viprion-configuration-11-4-1/1.html).
The GLB typically runs in active/active mode utilizing the distributed sync groups. This is similar to a HA pair running active/active where the configuration is synced between the devices to ensure config consistency.
Based on the above you can either buy 1 physical, 2 physical, 2 Virtual or 1 physical and 1 Virtual.
This doesn’t give you a clear path/answer to follow for best practice design, it’s a follow your mind/heart approach with what you a) feel comfortable with and b) feel is most robust/scalable.
Based on this information I will be looking at 3 options:
- 2 VMs, 1 for GTM and 1 VM for the LTM partitions
- 1 physical for GTM and 1 VM for the LTM partitions
- 1 physical utilizing vCMS
That being said, anyone reading this forum with similar design questions can select anything they want as it depends on a case by case basis and your business decisions.
Who told you that GTM can not work in partitions other then common? What you are going to achieve wit partitions?
Partitions designed to segregate access to the big-ip objects based on user roles.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com