For more information regarding the security incident at F5, the actions we are taking to address it, and our ongoing efforts to protect our customers, click here.

Forum Discussion

Ossar_178453's avatar
Ossar_178453
Icon for Altostratus rankAltostratus
Dec 15, 2015

Active-active and RHI (BGP) failover

Hello, I successfully managed to set up the functionality I am looking for but I am lacking the speedy failover that is required. Two F5 LTMs (VE edition), in an active-active configuration, i.e...
application delivery
bgp
BIG-IP
fire12_313356's avatar
fire12_313356
Icon for Altocumulus rankAltocumulus
Mar 28, 2017

Hello there is a protocol in the F5 LTM that's named BFD, In general, BFD detects connectivity changes more rapidly than the endpoints' standard Hello mechanisms.

 

i think that will help you

 

best regards

 

  • ingard's avatar
    ingard
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    Jul 05, 2017

    Did you get to the bottom of this? We're in the process of switching to an active/active bgp setup and was wondering if we should go with a separate link net for each ltm<->router pair or stick them on the same subnet. Does it even matter if you have a floating ip or not when bgp deals with the failover?