rseries
26 TopicsrSeries clean shut down
I am remotely managing some rSeries appliances for a customer. Two of the appliances must be physically moved soon. I have found KB articles telling me what NOT to do when powering off a rSeries appliance, but I have not found a document with a recommended shut down process. Naturally, I will remotely set all tenants from Deployed to Provisioned first. Engineers on site can will have hands on the appliances. Which method will provide the cleanest shut down for F5OS: console in to AOM and select "P" option, or use the LCD (I assume there is a "Power Off" option)? Or is there is another method? Thank you.3.8KViews0likes3CommentsForward Error Correction modes supported when deploying at 25G on Cisco 93180
All, We are looking to deploy a pair of r10600 LTM on the enterprise network at 25G, connecting uplink interfaces to a 93180YC-FX. In order to connect at 25G on the 93180, we must enable FEC on both ends. The Cisco's default mode FC-FEC CL74, and also supports CONS16-RS-FEC and IEEE-RS-FEC. Does anyone know what modes of FEC are supported by F5 (rSeries, VELOS, iSeries) for LTM? I only see enabled and AUTO as options, but not what modes are supported.Solved2.5KViews0likes2CommentsrSeries and tenant upgrades
I manage four r5900 appliances, hosting 16 tenants. The appliances are running F5OS-A 1.5.0; the tenants all run BIG-IP 15.1.10.2. We all know, of course, that the most recent QSN was released today. Normally, I'd upgrade everything to the latest version. However, where F5OS-A 1.7.0 is concerned, there is a "Known Issue" that raises a big red flag. In the release notes, 1380705-1 : BIG-IP tenant is stuck during boot up after doing tenant upgrade from 15.1.x to 17.1.x The issue description says this will not happen with every tenant. But it just has to happen once to ruin a day, right? In the past, I have always upgraded the appliance OS before upgrading the tenants. That just seemed to make sense. Given this issue, though, I am considering upgrading all of the tenants to BIG-IP 17.1.1.3 first, then upgrading the appliances to F5OS-A 1.7.0. Does anybody know of any pitfalls to this approach?1.6KViews0likes7CommentsF5OS support for TACACS+ over CLI
We ran into issues deploying rSeries and VELOS platforms on the network at our company using a custom form of TACACS+. Our implementation allows for application-specific domains with unique ports and keys. We had issues with it until we added the attribute value pairs to the TACACS+ domain profiles: Admin (unlimited_config): F5-F5OS-UID=1001 F5-F5OS-GID=9000 Operator (unlimited_enable): F5-F5OS-UID=1001 F5-F5OS-GID=9001 This change resolved the access issues via GUI and we are able to access using our TACACS+ credentials, but it does NOT work via CLI for access using the same credentials. We already have a case out to F5 about this, but I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing the same implementation challenge on accessing CLI using TACACS+.1.4KViews1like4CommentsRseries SCP OS to appliance from remote server
I'm new to rseries but I need to SCP an OS from a remote server onto the appliance via CLI. Server I am admining from holding OS only allows SCP file transfers out and https is not an option. What is the file path? From a admin linux box to r5600 i tried: "#scp <local F5OS.iso filename> admin@<r5600 IPaddress>:/system/images/staging" "#scp <local F5OS.iso filename> admin@<r5600 IPaddress>:/images/staging" "#scp <local F5OS.iso filename> admin@<r5600 IPaddress>:/system/images/import/iso" "#scp <local F5OS.iso filename> admin@<r5600 IPaddress>:/images/import/iso" Each time I get the response "Invalid pathname" https://techdocs.f5.com/en-us/f5os-a-1-5-0/f5-rseries-systems-administration-configuration/title-system-settings.html discusses it some but does not give me all of the information I need (or water it down enough for me). Any help is always apprecriatedSolved1KViews0likes5CommentsF5 Rseries HA
Dears, I know that there is no HA between rseries appliance, and the HA will be configured between tenants on each appliance, my question her about when i prepare to configure HA between Tenant so before making this i will configure the network setting and VLAN on F5OS so I will need a dedicated interface and HA VLAN between two tenants on each appliance so what is the next step after I configured the network setting on Appliance (F5OS), and what i need to confirm on the network setting that i will configure on each appliance (F5OS) to make HA between the two tenants837Views0likes2CommentsR-Series Appliance No GUI ( host system gui ) after 1.7.0 upgrade
After running the 1.7.0 upgrade for the r-series 5000 appliance - the login screen does not display in a browsers. Admin and Root passwords are as they were before upgrade. mgmt-ip settings are the same. Device can ping it's upstream router in the mgmt-ip network. the device mgmt-ip address does not reply to ping ( or any request [ ssh, http...]) from the console I can see the whole running config - it is the same as before the upgrade Any help is appreciated, Dave Mehlberg400Views0likes5CommentsIssue while migrating config from 4000s to r4600
Hi All, we are trying to migrate config from 4000s to r4600. We have created UCS on 4000s but while loading it on a tenant on r4600, we got an error saying ""load sys partition all platform migrate " - failed -- 010713d0:3: Symmetric Unit key decrypt failure - decrypt failure, configuration loading error: high-config-load-failed". Before loading the UCS from 4000s device to tenant, we copied the master key to the new tenant and verified it as well. The command used to load the UCS : load sys ucs <file name> no-license platform-migrate Didn't see any other error logs in /var/log/ltm. Could someone suggest how to resolve this issue ? Please note we are using a CA device certificate and not self signed certificate for the device. Also the management IP, trunk name and number of trunk ports in the UCS are different from those on the tenant.346Views0likes5CommentsWhat is the best practice to deploy single Tenant in F5 rseries?
Hi, we are going to deploy new rseries 5k with single Tenant. What is the best practice to setup? I plan to setup like below, can someone please advise whether it is correct or not? And I have question on auto disk space and memory allocation. Thanks in advance! Allocate all the disk space to this large single tenant Allocate all the memory to this single tenant within the tenant, set "Large" to "Mgmt" module for the rest modules: LTM, GTM , ASM , set "Normal" under Resource Provisioning". Seems the system automatically allocate disk space and memory to each module. Based on the amount of disk space and memory allocated to these modules, seems there are still a lot spare diskspace and memory. Will these modules automatically share the rest spare diskspace and memory when necessary?Solved319Views0likes2Comments