iqdump
2 TopicsGTM not discovering VS on newly created server
We have 2 DC's (A and B) - 1 x GTM and LTM in each. No layer 2 between DC's currently we have a number of vlans that are stretched to both LTM and GTM and self-ip's configured on both from the same subnet. In addition there are already a number of servers configured on the GTM with many auto-discovered VS attached so communication between LTM and GTM in each DC is working. A new vlan was added to DC A LTM and GTM and 3 VS were created on the LTM, the server was added to the GTM and it picked up the 3 new VS - Happy days. The same was replicated for DC B, however even though the server goes green it does NOT discover the 3 VS - not happy days. I've checked the iqdump and there are differences but I am unsure as to why. in DC A you get information shown between the which has the information you would expect (eg. /...info removed )</name></vip></p> <p>But on DC B iqdump you do not see the <vip> sections at all.</vip></p> <p>Both the LTM and GTM in DC B have been rebooted.</p> <p>Any other troubleshooting I can carry out or anybody else seen similar and can point me in the direction of what to do to fix. As other server / vs are discovered ok between the GTM/LTM I am a surprised this latest one does not.</p>299Views0likes2CommentsiQuery not Returning VIP data from LTM
I have a GTM (12.0.0) and an LTM (12.0.0) setup and have gone through the steps to set up communication between them using bigip_add. When I run a iqdump on the GTM, I see "server" data and "getconfig_element" data being returned but not "vip" data. I run tcpdump on the LTM and I see iquery communications coming in and going out of the LTM. Based on this, I assume the trust is set up correctly. The LTM has a "Green" status and I can go directly to it and reach my web server. Problem is, the GTM shows the LTM object as "Red" and will not return the IP address. We verified the LTM object defined in the GMT has the correct IP address and port number. Has anyone seen this before? Thanks249Views0likes1Comment