APM) NA error "Configuration download failed"
Hello everyone My client is currently using APM version 7253; prior to the OS upgrade, they were using version 7247. The setup involves an inline configuration with an SSL VA positioned upstream of the APM. Communication between the client and the SSL VA uses TLS 1.3, while communication between the SSL VA and the APM uses TLS 1.2. VPN connections worked normally when using version 7247, but an "NA error" appears after upgrading to version 7253. Has there been any change in TLS-related behavior between version 7247 and 7253? Alternatively, has anyone else encountered a similar issue?A Method for Auth and SSO
Recently, we discovered Cyberark has moved from the traditional HTML based auth page to the new JavaScript based. So, our client initiated sso method isn't working anymore. Webssso process could not identify the html form objects because there is no html form anymore. The new design relies on a bunch of JavaScripts which coordinates client browser to send requested data to be able to login. I never interested in JS and could not point out where the user credential comes into play either. I've found out another method to make SSO function work again. It is very basic and relies on the sideband method but i prefer to use http auth agent rather than sideband iRule. Since the "Http Auth" profile can store the http status code along with the cookies of the HTTP request we made, we can use it for basic jobs as "Sideband Http Requestor" Long story short, basically we sent crafted login request to auth page and it returns a couple of cookies[1] if credentials are valid. Then we sent those cookies to the client as a reponse. That is all. An iRule with two distict function is good enoug for this particular job. One function is to prepare json payload which we sent to the web service and the other one is parse the cookies from the response of the web service. You need a custom "HTTP Auth" profile. You can take a look at the below[2] as an example. HTTP Auth profile can be used only with http services not https. In order to use Http Auth profile for sending & receiving http messages to an https web service, you need to use a http2https virtual server which translates requests and responses. In my example[2] i sent http requests through a fake virtual server which is listening on "54.54.54.54:80" socket. The cyberark servers are attached in the pool behind this virtual server. I used this method for Grafana first around a year ago and it is still working. The grafana has similar login page which relies on JS. Here is my iRule: when CLIENT_ACCEPTED { ACCESS::restrict_irule_events disable } when ACCESS_POLICY_COMPLETED { if {[ACCESS::session data get {session.policy.result}] == "allow" } { log local0. "APM Session Started Successfuly in [ACCESS::session data get {session.user.sessionid}] for [ACCESS::session data get {session.logon.last.username}]" log local0. "APM DEBUG: Policy Complete Cookies: $respCookie_0 $respCookie_1 $respCookie_2" ACCESS::respond 302 Location "https://testpam.example.com/PasswordVault/v10/Accounts" "Connection" "close" "Set-Cookie" ${respCookie_0} "Set-Cookie" ${respCookie_1} "Set-Cookie" ${respCookie_2} } } when HTTP_REQUEST { if {[HTTP::has_responded]} { return } if {[string tolower [HTTP::path]] == "/logoff"} { set sid [ACCESS::session data get {session.user.sessionid}] log local0. "Logging out from [ACCESS::session data get {session.user.sessionid}] for [ACCESS::session data get {session.logon.last.username}]" HTTP::respond 302 noserver Location "https://testpam.example.com/PasswordVault/v10" "Connection" "close" "Set-Cookie" "CA11111=; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:00 GMT; path=/PasswordVault/; secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict" "Set-Cookie" "CA22222=; expires=expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:00 GMT; path=/PasswordVault/; secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict" "Set-Cookie" "CA66666=; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:00 GMT; path=/PasswordVault/; secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Stric" ACCESS::session remove -sid $sid } } when ACCESS_POLICY_AGENT_EVENT { if {[ACCESS::policy agent_id] == "LoginSessionCreate" } { # Generate JSON payload to sent the Cyberark v10 set uname [ACCESS::session data get {session.logon.last.username}] set passwd [ACCESS::session data get -secure {session.sso.token.last.password}] log local0. "APM DEBUG: User: $uname : $passwd" set payload {{"username":"UUUU","password":"PPPP"}} set cred "UUUU $uname PPPP $passwd" set payload [string map "$cred" $payload] log local0. "APM DEBUG: Payload $payload" ACCESS::session data set session.custom.http.payload $payload } if {[ACCESS::policy agent_id] == "CookiePreperation" } { #### HTTP Auth #### if {([ACCESS::session data get {session.http.last.response_cookie}] != "") && ([ACCESS::session data get {session.http.last.response_status}] == 200) } { # HTTP Auth Succeed set cookies [ACCESS::session data get {session.http.last.response_cookie}] log local0. "APM DEBUG: Raw Cookies: $cookies" set cookies [string trimright [string map { \\r\\n @ } $cookies] "@"] set cookies [split $cookies '@'] log local0. "APM DEBUG: Cookies Now: $cookies" set listCount 0 foreach cookie $cookies { if {![string match CA* $cookie]} { continue } log local0. "APM DEBUG: listCount: $listCount Cookie: $cookie" set respCookie_${listCount} $cookie incr listCount } log local0. "APM DEBUG: Total listCount: $listCount RespCookie: $respCookie_0 $respCookie_1 $respCookie_2" } } } I also have attached a screenshot of the APM policy. In that APM policy the "GrafanaLogin" is the HTTP Auth agent. Logging lines in the iRule can be suppressed as per your needs. Hope this is helpful for someone. [1]: Cookie names are: "CA11111", "CA22222", "CA66666" [2]: apm aaa http /Common/CyberArk_Login { auth-type custom-post connection-timeout 3 content-type none custom-body "%{session.custom.http.payload}" form-action http://54.54.54.54/PasswordVault/api/login/ headers { header0 { name Content-Type value application/json } } request-timeout 5 success-match-type cookie success-match-value CA11111 } May the source be with you...
Layered ASM for APM login page protection
Has anyone successfully implemented https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000149701 Full VPN clinets stop working after this implementation. I can see below errors Client machines interface IPs are not falling under a private subnet or exception subnet ranges provided by the APM server The connected network is vulnerable of tunnel crack as LocalIP falls under the public IPsRecommendation for Adv. Lab
Hi Everyone, I'm relatively new to F5 BIG-IP and want to improve my hands-on skills. I have a chance to build a good lab, but I'm struggling to find real-world use cases and troubleshooting scenarios. Currently, I can only run basic tests with DVWA, but I want to simulate a complex environment. Could you recommend any resources (videos, docs, or lab guides or anything can help) specifically for LTM, AWAF, DNS and APM, use-case scenarios, troubleshooting exercises, architectures etc. Any guidance to help me bridge the gap between basic setup and professional practice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
APM Policy loses POST request content when forwarding across multiple domains.
We have a problem like this, the AAA domain looks at the external side, we forward the requests from the outside to a virtual server located in the CCC internal domain as a policy base. We are authenticating with an apm policy with an internal server multidomain, but we lose the content of the incoming post request while forwarding. Of course, while the POST request is forwarded, GET returns, it catches it and POST is translated. However, the content disappears in the meantime. Is anyone having this problem?OCSP AUTH AGENT
Hello everyone, I'm facing a situation and I need your input to figure it out what's wrong. I have a VIP where mtls is configured in the client SSL profile with the issuer's certificate as CA (we call it CA_1), and it works well. (Per info, the client cert is issued by CA_1, which is also issued and signed by a higher authority CA_2.) I wanted to make OCSP checks for client certificates so I created a simple APM policy as follows : Client --- > on-demand cert agent ---> OCSP Auth Agent ---> Allow or deny The OCSP responder is configured with the same CA_1 that's configured in the in the Client authentication in the ssl profile, and a responder (ocsp.example.com). The error I'm facing is OCSP Auth agent: Failure status 'Error querying OCSP responder host ocsp.example.com. To troubleshoot, I did few tests and we can eliminate the following possibilities: Connectivity and DNS: I can reach the responder in the http port using the FQDN. Blocked traffic : no Firewall inspection between the BIG IP and the responder. The responder is not treating the request as it should: openssl ocsp verification works fine and gets me the wanted result from the ocsp responder. The famous "missing host header" : the header is well included in the request sent by the big ip to the responder; moreover, i compared this request to the one sent when using openssl ocsp and the one sent when i test from my own computer using openssl, and they are identical when it comes to the OCSP date in the request and response frames. What's more interesting is when I capture the response sent by the responder when the apm sends the ocsp verification request, i can clearly see that's stating the status of the certificate (which is revoked in my case), but the APM logs doesn't show that; instead, when debugging, it says that the on-demand cert agent is executed (i can see the client cert and the issuer cert CA_1 as well) and then it moves successfully to the OCSP auth agent and then directly it says the querying error. Could you please tell me if you see anything i could do to troubleshoot more ? Any ideas ? PS 1 : I tried also using the CA_2, a bundle of CA_1 and CA_2, a cert chain of both, but no luck ! PS 2 : when i use the CRLDP agent, i can see the status (revoked) in the APM logs. Thank you in advance !
Load balanced RDP VIP use in APM
HI I have a VIP on port 3389, load balancing to two rdp servers. RDP directly to that VIP IP works well. Now I created this as an rdp in apm, I used the dns name that the vip is resolving to as the destination address for the rdp, the apm url has a trusted cert. It gets as far as logging on then it throws the error: The connection has been terminated because an unexpected server authentication certificate was received from the remote computer Seems like the client connects to apm and gets the apm cert - trusted then they click the rdp icon and get the rdp file downloaded, the file has the gateway address of apm with trusted cert, and then the dns name of the rdp vip but then they get the servers real cert which doesn't match the vip dns name and errors. Can I proxy this connection on the F5? I have tried a combination of client and server profiles and the only way I get as far as a login prompt is to have no client or server profile in the vip. I would like the F5 to present its own apm cert to the client , I don't have the ability to put new SAN certs on the servers (not sure that would solve it anyway)
After upgrading from PeopleTools 8.59.11 to 8.61.11 F5 APM is not rewriting the internal URLs
After upgrading from PeopleTools 8.59.09 to 8.61.11 F5 APM is not rewriting all the internal urls for PeopleSoft Portal Application that also has Home page tiles from HRMS 9.2. Clicking on these tiles takes us to Internal URL instead of F5 externally resolvable url. How to troubleshoot this. I have a case opened with F5 support, but interested in any one else using F5 APM for peoplesoft and seeing similar error.
