Suddenly Can't access Login Box to F5 LTM Via SSH & GUI
is it, anyone in here happened this issue when you suddenly can't access your F5 LTM Via GUI & SSH with your own/default credential username & password ? the box is active & i can reach that via Web/browser & SSH but when i trying to login with 2 methods i cant access into the box even the username & pass is true. if someone in here have facing the issue or have Solution about this issue kindly to answer this topic please. Thankyou.21Views0likes3CommentsApplication drop down menus does not work behind F5 APM Portal Access
Hi, I have configured an application behind APM with portal access. When users reaching applicationon portal they can not see drop down menus on application. When I inspect network, there is no error on links. However, I have a problem on console saying "Sync load uicomponents xxxxx.xml". Do you have the same issue? How can I solve that problem? Best Regards,25Views0likes2CommentsF5 Hotfix
I am just trying to understand how do we do a hotfix patch in F5. I am not trying to understand the process but just which file needs to be selected. For example lets say I am currently in 16.1.4.3 so should I go to F5 download.f5.com and install the latest jumbo hotfix from that specific version or do I need to raise a case with F5 and ask for the file. Just bit confused about how should we go about selecting the Jumbo hotfix?20Views0likes4CommentsRedirection by uri + conditional NAT
Hello, I have a VS balancing on an OpenShift cluster. Recently we have the need to test some redirects by uri on a network segment outside of OpenShift, for this we thought of using a simple redirection iRule: when HTTP_REQUEST { switch -glob [string tolower [HTTP::path]] { “/uri/xxxx” { pool XXXX} } } The problem is that the default VS does not apply any NAT to incoming traffic. Would there be any way to apply sNAT only to incoming traffic that meets the iRule condition to be redirected, obviously without affecting OpenShift. Thanks, any help is welcome. Best regards8Views0likes1CommentBypass "Bad unescape" in Body POST (ASM, POST, JSON)
Here the Block. As you can see is "%" is detected without encoding meaning. This is normal since the "%" is in the Body of the post as JSON data (see below) Of course if I disable the "Bad unescape" in " Learning and Blocking Settings" it works, but my Goal is to bypass using rule on parameter or similar, till now without success. Does anyone have a solution ? ======= JSON on POST Dody Request =======================50Views0likes11CommentsURL redirect
Hi Team, Can someone please help me to build the irule script. I have two VS VS1: vs_tableau.ucsf.edu_443 pool: pool_tableau.ucsf.edu_443 VS2: vs_tableauqa.ucsf.edu_443 pool:pool_tableauqa.ucsf.edu_443 I wanted to redirect the below URL: FROM - https://tableau.ucsf.edu/#/site/QA/views/AllTableauDashboards/AllTableauDashboards TO - https://tableauqa.ucsf.edu/#/site/QA/views/AllTableauDashboards/AllTableauDashboards Note: This is single URL as of now but there would be multiple URL in future to redirect from tableau.ucsf.edu to tableauQA.ucsf.edu30Views1like3CommentsCertificate server name issue--wildcard certificate
Hello all, I have one virtual server, and I have a policy behind it that redirects to multiple pools. The problem is that my customer requested a certificate for a few applications and requested it as wildcard.xyz.com. However, the application has two dns records as xyz.com and www.xyz.com. Of course, when I call the page as xyz.com, I get a certificate error (not a secure connection). Here, my policy record is as follows: if the host "xyz.com or www.xyz.com" is owned by the host, redirect the traffic to the xyz-pool. I wrote a redirect irule to overcome this. But it didn't work. The rule is like this: when HTTP_REQUEST { if {[HTTP::host] equals "xyz.com"} { HTTP::redirect "https://www.xyz.com[HTTP::uri]" } } anyone have any ideas or suggestion? Thank you in advance for your answers39Views0likes4CommentsHelp configuring NAT64 on a BIG-IP LTM
I have been trying to implement NAT64 in our network in order for IPv6 only clients can reach our IPv4 only servers. Ive create an IPv6 VIP and enabled the nat6to4 option and port and address translation are enabled. VIP: ipv6 Pool: IPv4 Snat: Auto map when i do #show sys connection cs-server-address 2a:66:x.x.x.xx client IPaddress VIP ip address floating ip address node 2a:45:33.xxx 2a:66:x.x.x.xx any6 any6 I able to see the client IPv6 address reaching to the VIP. But the F5 is not loadbalancing to the backend server How can i make this to work Any help would be greatly appreciated.56Views0likes3Comments